Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(j-s): Police case numbers input #18086

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 25, 2025
Merged

fix(j-s): Police case numbers input #18086

merged 7 commits into from
Feb 25, 2025

Conversation

unakb
Copy link
Member

@unakb unakb commented Feb 21, 2025

Asana

What

  • Prevent users from being able to input the same police case number twice.
  • Hide close icon on the first police case number if the case's origin was the police case system.

Why

There shouldn't ever be any need to have the same police case number twice in the same case. It also leads to buggy behaviour.

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced validations prevent the removal of a crucial police number during case updates.
    • Improved error messaging and input controls now guide users when managing police numbers.
  • Refactor
    • Improved code organization and readability through the introduction of helper functions.

@unakb unakb requested a review from a team as a code owner February 21, 2025 16:41
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 21, 2025

Walkthrough

This update introduces additional validation logic for police case numbers. In the backend, the CaseController now checks that the main police case number is retained during an update when the case origin is LOKE, throwing an exception if it is removed. On the frontend, the PoliceCaseNumbers component has been refactored by adding a dedicated validation function, improving error handling, and reorganizing rendering logic.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
apps/judicial-system/.../case.controller.ts Added a validation in the update method to ensure that for cases with origin LOKE, the main police case number remains in the update; imported CaseOrigin enum.
apps/judicial-system/.../PoliceCaseNumbers.tsx Introduced the validatePoliceCaseNumber function, enhanced the error handling during add/update operations, modified removal logic for LOKE cases, and refactored list rendering with the new helper function.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix(j-s): Validation fix #16930: The changes in the main PR, which enhance validation for police case numbers in the CaseController, are related to the modifications in the retrieved PR that also focus on validation for the policeCaseNumbers property in the DTOs, specifically addressing the same data structure.
  • chore(j-s): add police case numbers to revoke indictment notification email #17385: The changes in the main PR, which focus on validating police case numbers during case updates, are related to the modifications in the retrieved PR that involve the handling and inclusion of police case numbers in notification emails, as both address the management of police case numbers in the context of case processing.

Suggested labels

automerge

Suggested reviewers

  • oddsson

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 10ee8dc and 19edb98.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/case.controller.ts (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/case.controller.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: build (judicial-system-web)
  • GitHub Check: tests (judicial-system-web)
  • GitHub Check: tests (judicial-system-backend)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Feb 21, 2025

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 19edb98.

Command Status Duration Result
nx run-many --projects judicial-system-backend ... ✅ Succeeded 14m 44s View ↗
nx run-many --target=build --projects=judicial-... ✅ Succeeded 6m 2s View ↗
nx run-many --projects judicial-system-web --ta... ✅ Succeeded 3m 58s View ↗
nx run-many --target=build --projects=judicial-... ✅ Succeeded 41s View ↗
nx run-many --target=lint --projects=judicial-s... ✅ Succeeded 18s View ↗
nx run-many --target=codegen/frontend-client --... ✅ Succeeded 13s View ↗
nx run-many --target=codegen/backend-schema --a... ✅ Succeeded 37s View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-02-25 14:25:40 UTC

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/components/PoliceCaseNumbers/PoliceCaseNumbers.tsx (1)

143-177: Consider enhancing accessibility with semantic HTML.

While the implementation is good, consider these accessibility improvements:

  • Use <ul> or <ol> for the list container instead of Box.
  • Add appropriate ARIA roles and labels for the list container.
-      <Box display="flex" flexWrap="wrap" data-testid="policeCaseNumbers-list">
+      <ul
+        role="list"
+        aria-label="Police case numbers"
+        style={{ display: 'flex', flexWrap: 'wrap', listStyle: 'none', padding: 0 }}
+        data-testid="policeCaseNumbers-list"
+      >
         {clientPoliceNumbers.map((policeCaseNumber, index) => (
-          <Box
+          <li
             key={`${policeCaseNumber}-${index}`}
-            paddingRight={1}
-            paddingBottom={1}
+            style={{ paddingRight: '8px', paddingBottom: '8px' }}
           >
             <Tag
               variant="darkerBlue"
               onClick={onRemove(policeCaseNumber)}
               aria-label={`Eyða númeri ${policeCaseNumber}`}
               disabled={isLOKECase && index === 0}
             >
               <Box display="flex" alignItems="center">
                 <Box paddingRight={'smallGutter'}>{policeCaseNumber}</Box>
                 {isLOKECase && index === 0 ? null : (
                   <Icon icon="close" size="small" />
                 )}
               </Box>
             </Tag>
-          </Box>
+          </li>
         ))}
-      </Box>
+      </ul>
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 41c6578 and 0a29e06.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/case.controller.ts (2 hunks)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/components/PoliceCaseNumbers/PoliceCaseNumbers.tsx (5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`apps/**/*`: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following...

apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
  • apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/case.controller.ts
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/components/PoliceCaseNumbers/PoliceCaseNumbers.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/components/PoliceCaseNumbers/PoliceCaseNumbers.tsx (3)

46-70: LGTM! Well-structured validation function.

The validation function is well-implemented with proper type safety, clear error messages, and follows a good separation of concerns by handling format and uniqueness validation separately.


84-104: LGTM! Robust error handling and state management.

The function properly handles error states and synchronizes with the server, ensuring data consistency.


119-141: LGTM! Correctly implements LOKE case number retention.

The function successfully implements the requirement to retain the first police case number for LOKE cases while removing duplicates, aligning with the PR objectives.

apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/case.controller.ts (1)

275-282: LGTM! Proper validation for LOKE case numbers.

The validation logic correctly ensures that the main police case number cannot be removed in LOKE cases, providing appropriate error handling and aligning with the PR objectives.

Copy link
Member

@gudjong gudjong left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One change request in the backend logic.

@unakb unakb requested a review from gudjong February 24, 2025 14:00
@gudjong gudjong added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 25, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 00c5c14 Feb 25, 2025
31 checks passed
@gudjong gudjong deleted the j-s/fix-police-case-numbers branch February 25, 2025 16:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants