-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Initial update to remove the web integration tests from the core tck #532
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c800552
Initial update to remove the web integration tests from the core tck,…
starksm64 db4bf95
Restore the ability to run against a different TCK version using the …
starksm64 c67b591
Update the sigtest plugin, signature file and docs
starksm64 02d0e29
Update the sigtest plugin, signature file and docs
starksm64 10955e9
Update the sigtest plugin, signature file and docs
starksm64 73b4ca6
Merge branch 'master' into eeint
starksm64 ea44254
Merge branch 'master' into eeint
starksm64 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
cdi.tck-4.0.version
property is for Weld, right? At the moment, Weld usescdi.tck-4-1.version
(and I don't see a PR in https://github.com/weld/core to change it), so this change (here and elsewhere) is wrong.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, there is a separate weld.version for that. How this cdi.tck-4-0.version property was used was to allow one to select a different version of the TCK when running the sample test runner poms. Really this dates back to when one could do minor releases of the TCK without doing a full release, so I just dropped it as it is confusing as to what the purpose is and it just complicates the build and verifying it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think Ladislav is right here. This command is taken from Weld to execute TCKs against certain TCK version and the property is defined in Weld here as
cdi.tck-4-1.version
The reason it's so explicit is that in some point in time Weld had to run against two different TCK majors (around CDI 2/3 IIRC). That being said, I wouldn't mind changing it to
cdi.tck.version
if that's what you'd prefer.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, that is confusing. Let me look at exactly Weld uses it and how this fits into how the TCK is released now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can't see why we would want to take the CDI TCK version used by the sample TCK runner from the weld-core-parent pom cdi.tck-4-1.version value. What is missing in the current changes is a default value for the cdi.tck.version and not using filtering on this property when the jboss-runner.pom is copied to the dist weld/jboss-tck-runner/pom.xml file so that one can override the CDI TCK version used. We can talk about it in today's call.