Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade ipython from 7.34.0 to 8.10.0 #28

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jaswinder9051998
Copy link
Owner

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `pip` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • docs/requirement.txt
⚠️ Warning
mkdocs-material 8.0.1 requires pygments, which is not installed.
mkdocs-material 8.0.1 requires mkdocs-material-extensions, which is not installed.
mkdocs-material 8.0.1 requires markdown, which is not installed.
mkdocs-material 8.0.1 requires pymdown-extensions, which is not installed.
mkdocs-material 8.0.1 requires mkdocs, which is not installed.
jupyter-nbextensions-configurator 0.6.1 requires notebook, which is not installed.
jupyter-contrib-nbextensions 0.7.0 requires nbconvert, which is not installed.
jupyter-contrib-nbextensions 0.7.0 requires notebook, which is not installed.
jupyter-contrib-core 0.4.2 requires notebook, which is not installed.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

By pinning:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Upgrade Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
medium severity 603/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 4.2
Remote Code Execution (RCE)
SNYK-PYTHON-IPYTHON-3318382
ipython:
7.34.0 -> 8.10.0
No Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

The following vulnerabilities are fixed by pinning transitive dependencies:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-IPYTHON-3318382
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Base: 90.95% // Head: 90.95% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (3eb258f) compared to base (7c502b8).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #28   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.95%   90.95%           
=======================================
  Files          16       16           
  Lines         829      829           
=======================================
  Hits          754      754           
  Misses         75       75           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 90.95% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants