pom.xml:113-117: Transitive dependencies for hamcrest 1.3...

[0pdd]

The puzzle 171-f8bc6a22 from #171 has to be resolved:

jcabi-http/pom.xml

Lines 113 to 117 in b76b7f4

	@todo #171:30m Transitive dependencies for hamcrest 1.3 and junit 4
	comes from this dependency.
	1) Upgrade jcabi-matchers to the same version of parent as jcabi-http.
	2) Replace hamcrest 1.3 with hamcrest 2.2 (?) from parent
	3) Replace junit 5 with junit 5

The puzzle was created by andreoss on 25-Jun-20.

Estimate: 30 minutes, role: DEV.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.

[0crat]

@yegor256/z please, pay attention to this issue

[0crat]

@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[andreoss]

Blocked by jcabi/jcabi-matchers#40

[0crat]

@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)