Only use accessKey and secretKey if they are not blank - fix NullPointerException: Access key ID cannot be blank #265
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Only use the accessKey and secretKey if they are provided. Before it was only checking if role was blank. This allows the creation of a secret that uses the instance profile. This is useful if you want to parameterize the secret being passed in - one for the instance profile and a different one for a different account. This functionality existed before in earlier versions of the plugin, this is restoring that functionality.
Fixes #264
Testing done
240.v6d844a_6f5480
withKey
that had a valid access and secret access key (from a second account) and blank rolewithBlanks
that had a blank access key, blank secret access key, and blank roleaws s3 ls
wrapped in withCredentials with both credentialswithKey
worked and listed buckets in the second accountwithBlanks
failed with NullPointerExceptionSubmitter checklist