Wrap app bars on smaller screens

[janfaracik]

Our App bars don't currently behave very well on smaller screens, such as phones/tablets/snapped windows. These PR aims to alleviate some of those issues by wrapping controls where appropriate, or aligning them side by side (and filling the remaining white space). This isn't perfect but should be a reasonable improvement for users on smaller devices. This shouldn't have any impact on larger devices.

Testing done

Desktop (before)

Desktop (after)

Phone (before)

Phone (after)

Phone (before)

Phone (after)

Proposed changelog entries

• Wrap app bars on smaller screens

Proposed upgrade guidelines

N/A

Submitter checklist

Preview Give feedback

1. The Jira issue, if it exists, is well-described.
2. The changelog entries and upgrade guidelines are appropriate for the audience affected by the change (users or developers, depending on the change) and are in the imperative mood (see examples). Fill in the Proposed upgrade guidelines section only if there are breaking changes or changes that may require extra steps from users during upgrade.
3. There is automated testing or an explanation as to why this change has no tests.
4. New public classes, fields, and methods are annotated with @Restricted or have @since TODO Javadocs, as appropriate.
5. New deprecations are annotated with @Deprecated(since = "TODO") or @Deprecated(forRemoval = true, since = "TODO"), if applicable.
6. New or substantially changed JavaScript is not defined inline and does not call eval to ease future introduction of Content Security Policy (CSP) directives (see documentation).
7. For dependency updates, there are links to external changelogs and, if possible, full differentials.
8. For new APIs and extension points, there is a link to at least one consumer.

Desired reviewers

@jenkinsci/sig-ux

Before the changes are marked as ready-for-merge:

Maintainer checklist

Preview Give feedback

1. There are at least two (2) approvals for the pull request and no outstanding requests for change.
2. Conversations in the pull request are over, or it is explicit that a reviewer is not blocking the change.
3. Changelog entries in the pull request title and/or Proposed changelog entries are accurate, human-readable, and in the imperative mood.
4. Proper changelog labels are set so that the changelog can be generated automatically.
5. If the change needs additional upgrade steps from users, the upgrade-guide-needed label is set and there is a Proposed upgrade guidelines section in the pull request title (see example).
6. If it would make sense to backport the change to LTS, a Jira issue must exist, be a Bug or Improvement, and be labeled as lts-candidate to be considered (see query).

[A1exKH]

@janfaracik LGTM.

[krisstern]

Seeing something like this in the error log, looks formatting related:

20:06:06  [ERROR] Failed to execute goal com.github.eirslett:frontend-maven-plugin:1.15.1:corepack (prettier) on project jenkins-parent: Failed to run task: 'corepack yarn exec prettier --check .' failed. org.apache.commons.exec.ExecuteException: Process exited with an error: 1 (Exit value: 1) -> [Help 1]
20:06:06  org.apache.maven.lifecycle.LifecycleExecutionException: Failed to execute goal com.github.eirslett:frontend-maven-plugin:1.15.1:corepack (prettier) on project jenkins-parent: Failed to run task

[janfaracik]

Seeing something like this in the error log, looks formatting related:

20:06:06  [ERROR] Failed to execute goal com.github.eirslett:frontend-maven-plugin:1.15.1:corepack (prettier) on project jenkins-parent: Failed to run task: 'corepack yarn exec prettier --check .' failed. org.apache.commons.exec.ExecuteException: Process exited with an error: 1 (Exit value: 1) -> [Help 1]
20:06:06  org.apache.maven.lifecycle.LifecycleExecutionException: Failed to execute goal com.github.eirslett:frontend-maven-plugin:1.15.1:corepack (prettier) on project jenkins-parent: Failed to run task

Ah missed that - thanks!

[krisstern]

Hey you are welcome!