Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JENKINS-70291: Adding support for Timestamper #124

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2024

Conversation

hypery2k
Copy link
Contributor

@hypery2k hypery2k commented Sep 7, 2024

📝 Description

Adding support for Timestamper, see JENKINS-70291

🎯 Relevant issues

💎 Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

📜 Example code

🚦 How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Test A
  • Test B

🏁 Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas

@hypery2k hypery2k self-assigned this Sep 7, 2024
@hypery2k hypery2k requested a review from a team as a code owner September 7, 2024 10:58
@hypery2k hypery2k force-pushed the feature/timestamper-support branch from 314d4d7 to f9a811c Compare November 28, 2024 06:27
@hypery2k hypery2k added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 28, 2024
Merged via the queue into develop with commit dcce20a Nov 28, 2024
5 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant