Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The app didn't start on Revit 2025 #293

Open
Uetna opened this issue Sep 23, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #296
Open

The app didn't start on Revit 2025 #293

Uetna opened this issue Sep 23, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #296
Labels
bug 🐛 An unexpected issue that highlights incorrect behavior duplicate 👥 Indicates that an identical issue or PR already exists

Comments

@Uetna
Copy link

Uetna commented Sep 23, 2024

RevitLookup version

2025.0.9

Steps to reproduce

image
installed version of RevitLookup-2025.0.9 - SingleUser. msi

✔️ Expected Behavior

No response

❌ Actual Behavior

No response

Other Software

Revit version
25.2.0.38
20240715_1515(x64)
2025.2

@Uetna Uetna added bug 🐛 An unexpected issue that highlights incorrect behavior unverified ⌛ Needs more investigation to conclude it's an actual bug labels Sep 23, 2024
@Nice3point
Copy link
Collaborator

Please Download the DependenciesReport #269 and share your report.

Found a strange problem with Revit 2025 which cannot load a library version higher than the one already loaded in the domain. This is currently being investigated. But we can update it manually without consequences

@Nice3point Nice3point added duplicate 👥 Indicates that an identical issue or PR already exists and removed unverified ⌛ Needs more investigation to conclude it's an actual bug labels Sep 23, 2024
@Nice3point Nice3point linked a pull request Jan 7, 2025 that will close this issue
13 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug 🐛 An unexpected issue that highlights incorrect behavior duplicate 👥 Indicates that an identical issue or PR already exists
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants