Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BACKEND][HUGE] Function Support in variable syntax #838

Merged
merged 269 commits into from
Dec 19, 2023
Merged

Conversation

jmbannon
Copy link
Owner

@jmbannon jmbannon commented Dec 13, 2023

A complete gutting of the internals of ytdl-sub to support functions in our variable syntax, in addition to being able to access a yt-dlp entry's .info.json fields using functions. Functionally, ytdl-sub should still look and behave the same from a user-perspective.

With so many lines of code changed (+8925, -2708), no doubt there will be new issues. Please make a GH issue or reach out on Discord if your config/subscriptions break in any way/shape/form.

Details on how to use function support will come soon in the form of proper documentation in our readthedocs.

@jmbannon jmbannon merged commit e92b1cd into master Dec 19, 2023
35 checks passed
@jmbannon jmbannon deleted the j/func-apply branch December 19, 2023 00:08
Svagtlys pushed a commit to Svagtlys/ytdl-sub that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2023
A complete gutting of the internals of ytdl-sub to support functions in our variable syntax, in addition to being able to access a yt-dlp entry's .info.json fields using functions. Functionally, ytdl-sub should still look and behave the same from a user-perspective.

With so many lines of code changed (+8927, -2708), no doubt there will be new issues. Please make a GH issue or reach out on Discord if your config/subscriptions break in any way/shape/form.

Details on how to use function support will come soon in the form of proper documentation in our readthedocs.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant