add files to check issues for reproduction repository and maintainer …

…access

.github/workflows/check-pr-maintainer-access.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+name: check-pr-maintainer-access
+
+on:
+  pull_request_target:
+    types:
+      - opened
+
+permissions:
+  pull-requests: write
+
+jobs:
+  notify-when-maintainers-cannot-edit:
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/github-script@v3
+        with:
+          script: |
+            const query = `
+                query($number: Int!) {
+                    repository(owner: "joelbutcher", name: "socialstream") {
+                        pullRequest(number: $number) {
+                            headRepositoryOwner {
+                                login
+                            }
+                            maintainerCanModify
+                        }
+                    }
+                }
+            `
+
+            const pullNumber = context.issue.number
+            const variables = { number: pullNumber }
+
+            try {
+                console.log(`Check #${pullNumber} for maintainer edit access...`)
+                const result = await github.graphql(query, variables)
+
+                console.log(JSON.stringify(result, null, 2))
+
+                const pullRequest = result.repository.pullRequest
+
+                if (pullRequest.headRepositoryOwner.login === 'joelbutcher') {
+                    console.log('PR owned by joelbutcher')
+
+                    return
+                }
+
+                if (! pullRequest.maintainerCanModify) {
+                    console.log('PR not owned by joelbutcher and does not have maintainer edits enabled')
+
+                    await github.issues.createComment({
+                        issue_number: pullNumber,
+                        owner: 'joelbutcher',
+                        repo: 'socialstream',
+                        body: 'Thanks for submitting a PR!\n\nIn order to review and merge PRs most efficiently, we require that all PRs grant maintainer edit access before we review them. If your fork belongs to a GitHub organization, please move the repository to your personal account and try again. If you\'re already using a personal fork, you can learn how to enable maintainer access [in the GitHub documentation](https://docs.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-pull-requests/working-with-forks/allowing-changes-to-a-pull-request-branch-created-from-a-fork).'
+                    })
+
+                    await github.issues.update({
+                        issue_number: pullNumber,
+                        owner: 'joelbutcher',
+                        repo: context.repo.repo,
+                        state: 'closed'
+                    })
+                }
+            } catch(error) {
+                console.log(error)
+            }

.github/workflows/manage-issue.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
+name: manage-issue
+
+on:
+  issues:
+    types: [opened, edited]
+
+jobs:
+  check-repro:
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/github-script@v3
+        with:
+          script: |
+            const URL_REGEXP = /### Reproduction repository[\r\n]+([^#]+)###/m
+            const REPRO_STEPS_REGEXP = /### Steps to reproduce[\r\n]+([^#]+)###/m
+            const LABEL_NEEDS_MORE_INFORMATION = 'needs more info'
+            const LABEL_UNCONFIRMED = 'unconfirmed'
+
+            function debug(...args) {
+                core.info(args.map(JSON.stringify).join(' '))
+            }
+
+            if (context.payload.comment) {
+                debug('Ignoring comment update.')
+
+                return
+            }
+
+            const user = context.payload.sender.login
+            const issue = context.payload.issue
+            const body = issue.body
+            const urlMatch = body.match(URL_REGEXP)
+            const reproStepsMatch = body.match(REPRO_STEPS_REGEXP)
+            const url = urlMatch !== null ? urlMatch[1].trim() : null
+            const reproSteps = reproStepsMatch !== null ? reproStepsMatch[1].trim() : null
+
+            debug(`Found URL '${url}'`)
+            debug(`Found repro steps '${reproSteps}'`)
+
+            async function createComment(comment) {
+                comment = comment
+                    .split('\n')
+                    .map((line) => line.trim())
+                    .join('\n')
+                    .trim()
+
+                await github.issues.createComment({
+                    issue_number: context.issue.number,
+                    owner: context.repo.owner,
+                    repo: context.repo.repo,
+                    body: comment,
+                })
+            }
+
+            async function getGitHubActionComments() {
+                debug(`Loading existing comments...`)
+
+                const comments = await github.issues.listComments({
+                    issue_number: context.issue.number,
+                    owner: context.repo.owner,
+                    repo: context.repo.repo,
+                })
+
+                return comments.data.filter(comment => {
+                    debug(`comment by user: '${comment.user.login}'`)
+                    return comment.user.login === 'github-actions[bot]'
+                })
+            }
+
+            async function getIssueLabels() {
+                const issues = await github.issues.listLabelsOnIssue({
+                    issue_number: context.issue.number,
+                    owner: context.repo.owner,
+                    repo: context.repo.repo,
+                })
+
+                return issues.data
+            }
+
+            async function updateIssue(state, state_reason = null) {
+                await github.issues.update({
+                    owner: context.repo.owner,
+                    repo: context.repo.repo,
+                    issue_number: context.issue.number,
+                    state,
+                    state_reason,
+                })
+            }
+
+            async function closeWithComment(comment) {
+                if (issue.state !== 'open') {
+                    debug(`Issue is not open`)
+
+                    return
+                }
+
+                const comments = await getGitHubActionComments()
+
+                if (comments.length > 0) {
+                    debug(`Already commented on issue won't comment again`)
+
+                    return
+                }
+
+                debug(`Missing required information`)
+
+                await github.issues.addLabels({
+                    issue_number: context.issue.number,
+                    owner: context.repo.owner,
+                    repo: context.repo.repo,
+                    labels: [LABEL_NEEDS_MORE_INFORMATION],
+                })
+
+                await createComment(comment)
+
+                await updateIssue('closed', 'not_planned')
+            }
+
+            async function openWithComment(comment) {
+                if (issue.state !== 'closed') {
+                    debug(`Issue is already open`)
+
+                    return
+                }
+
+                const labels = await getIssueLabels()
+                const label = labels.find(label => label.name === LABEL_NEEDS_MORE_INFORMATION)
+
+                if (! label) {
+                    debug(`Issue was not tagged as needs information`)
+
+                    return
+                }
+
+                const comments = await getGitHubActionComments()
+
+                if (comments.length === 0) {
+                    debug(`Issue was closed by someone else, won't reopen`)
+
+                    return
+                }
+
+                debug(`Reopening closed issue`)
+
+                await github.issues.removeLabel({
+                    issue_number: context.issue.number,
+                    owner: context.repo.owner,
+                    repo: context.repo.repo,
+                    name: LABEL_NEEDS_MORE_INFORMATION,
+                })
+
+                await createComment(comment)
+
+                await updateIssue('open')
+            }
+
+            const COMMENT_HEADER = `
+                Hey @${user}! We're sorry to hear that you've hit this issue. 💛
+            `.trim()
+
+            const NO_REPRO_URL = ((! url) || (! url.includes('https://github.com/')) || (url.includes('https://github.com/joelbutcher') && (! url.includes('https://github.com/joelbutcher/socialstream-demo'))))
+            const NO_REPRO_STEPS = reproSteps.length < 25
+
+            if (NO_REPRO_URL || NO_REPRO_STEPS) {
+                let comment = `
+                    ${COMMENT_HEADER}
+
+                `
+
+                if (NO_REPRO_URL) {
+                    comment += `
+                        However, it looks like you forgot to fill in the reproduction repository URL. Can you edit your original post and then we'll look at your issue?
+
+                        We need a public GitHub repository which contains a Laravel app with the minimal amount of Socialstream code to reproduce the problem. **Please do not link to your actual project**, what we need instead is a _minimal_ reproduction in a fresh project without any unnecessary code. This means it doesn\'t matter if your real project is private / confidential, since we want a link to a separate, isolated reproduction. That would allow us to download it and review your bug much easier, so it can be fixed quicker. Please make sure to include a database seeder with everything we need to set the app up quickly.
+                    `
+                }
+
+                if (NO_REPRO_URL && NO_REPRO_STEPS) {
+                    comment += `
+
+                        Also, `
+                } else if (NO_REPRO_STEPS) {
+                    comment += `
+
+                        However, `
+                }
+
+                if (NO_REPRO_STEPS) {
+                    comment += `it doesn't look like you've provided much information on how to replicate the issue. Please edit your original post with clear steps we need to take.`
+                }
+
+                closeWithComment(comment)
+            } else {
+                openWithComment(`
+                    Thank you for providing reproduction steps! Reopening the issue now.
+                `)
+            }