This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 1, 2020. It is now read-only.
Using dplyr::bind_rows() instead of dplyr::rbind_all() #1
+3
−3
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We're tidyverse/dplyr#4579 in the process of releasing dplyr 0.8.4 and this package fail at our reverse dependency checks because the
dplyr::rbind_all()
function has been formally removed after being deprecated for many versions.We might revert that decision because it affects a handful of packages, but in any case even if
rbind_all()
stays a little longer, you still should usebind_rows()
instead.