Stylelint remove formatter test #11
Conversation
…ng the previous formatter approach.
WalkthroughThe changes include the addition of a new Stylelint problem matcher configuration in a JSON file, which enhances error reporting during linting processes. The workflow for linting has been updated to incorporate this problem matcher, improving the integration of linting results in GitHub Actions. Additionally, the linting command in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/lint.yaml (1)
39-41: Add newline at end of file.The cleanup step is well-implemented with the
always()condition. However, there's a minor formatting issue to address.Apply this diff to add the missing newline:
- if: "always()" name: "Remove Stylelint Problem Matcher" - run: "echo '::remove-matcher::./.github/problem-matchers/stylelint.json'" + run: "echo '::remove-matcher::./.github/problem-matchers/stylelint.json'" +🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 41-41: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.github/problem-matchers/stylelint.json(1 hunks).github/workflows/lint.yaml(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)src/components/CentralContainer/index.css(1 hunks)src/index.css(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .github/problem-matchers/stylelint.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/lint.yaml
[error] 41-41: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🪛 GitHub Check: lint-check
src/components/CentralContainer/index.css
[failure] 9-9:
Delete "⏎"
[failure] 10-10:
Expected "display" to come before "width"
[failure] 10-10:
Unexpected empty line before property "display"
src/index.css
[failure] 7-7:
Delete "⏎⏎⏎"
[failure] 19-19:
Expected "BlinkMacSystemFont" to be "blinkmacsystemfont"
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/components/CentralContainer/index.css (1)
6-10: LGTM on the functional changes!
The reintroduction of display: grid is correct and necessary for the grid layout to function properly with the defined template columns.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: lint-check
[failure] 9-9:
Delete "⏎"
[failure] 10-10:
Expected "display" to come before "width"
[failure] 10-10:
Unexpected empty line before property "display"
.github/workflows/lint.yaml (2)
34-38: LGTM! Well-structured lint execution step.
The step is well-organized with:
- Clear step name
- Proper environment variable setup for NO_COLOR
- Clean command execution
32-33: Verify the problem matcher configuration file exists.
The setup looks good, but let's ensure the referenced problem matcher configuration file exists.
✅ Verification successful
Problem matcher configuration is properly set up and valid
The Stylelint problem matcher configuration exists at the expected location and contains valid JSON with the correct pattern matching structure for Stylelint output parsing.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the existence of the Stylelint problem matcher configuration
if [ -f ".github/problem-matchers/stylelint.json" ]; then
echo "✓ Problem matcher configuration exists"
# Validate JSON syntax
jq '.' .github/problem-matchers/stylelint.json
else
echo "✗ Missing problem matcher configuration at .github/problem-matchers/stylelint.json"
fi
Length of output: 564
|
|
||
|
|
||
| display: grid; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Fix style issues to improve code consistency.
While the addition of display: grid is functionally correct and necessary for the grid layout to work, there are some style issues to address:
- Remove the extra empty lines
- Reorder properties to follow conventional CSS property ordering (layout properties like
displayshould come before dimensional properties)
Apply this diff to fix the style issues:
.central-container {
+ display: grid;
grid-template-columns: var(--ylv-panel-width) calc(100vw - var(--ylv-panel-width));
width: 100vw;
-
-
- display: grid;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| display: grid; | |
| .central-container { | |
| display: grid; | |
| grid-template-columns: var(--ylv-panel-width) calc(100vw - var(--ylv-panel-width)); | |
| width: 100vw; | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: lint-check
[failure] 9-9:
Delete "⏎"
[failure] 10-10:
Expected "display" to come before "width"
[failure] 10-10:
Unexpected empty line before property "display"
| @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ | |||
| "lint:check": "npm-run-all --sequential --continue-on-error lint:check:*", | |||
| "lint:check:css": "stylelint src/**/*.css", | |||
| "lint:check:js": "eslint src webpack.*.js --max-warnings 0", | |||
| "lint:ci": "npm-run-all --sequential --continue-on-error lint:check:js \"lint:check:css -- --formatter github\"", | |||
| "lint:ci": "npm-run-all --sequential --continue-on-error lint:check:*", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove redundant lint:ci script.
The lint:ci script is now identical to the lint:check script (line 8). To maintain DRY principles and reduce maintenance overhead, consider removing the lint:ci script and updating any CI workflows to use lint:check instead.
Apply this diff to remove the redundant script:
- "lint:ci": "npm-run-all --sequential --continue-on-error lint:check:*",Then update your CI workflow to use npm run lint:check instead of npm run lint:ci.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "lint:ci": "npm-run-all --sequential --continue-on-error lint:check:*", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We want to check all errors instead of stop on an error. This suggestion seems to be invalid.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Henry8192, understood. Thank you for the clarification.
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: Henry8192
PR: junhaoliao/yscope-log-viewer#11
File: package.json:14-14
Timestamp: 2024-11-09T21:51:16.594Z
Learning: In `package.json` for the `yscope-log-viewer` project, maintain the `lint:ci` script separately from `lint:check` because it is configured to check all errors instead of stopping on an error.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
|
closing this PR which was for testing GH workflows |
References
Description
Validation performed
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
.central-containerclass, ensuring proper display.Chores
package.jsonto streamline the linting process.Style