add the pass and fail criteria in the slot rubric

data/rubric_slot.txt

@@ -18,11 +18,14 @@ Evaluate whether it's a "pass" or a "fail".
 In the [Query], a user asks the assistant a question or makes a request, and in [Available Functions], there exists a suitable function to perform this task, but there is a lack of required parameter values needed to call the function. In this [Submission], the assistant is required to ask the user for any additional information necessary to invoke the appropriate function and complete the task. You are given a [Ground Truth] for each [Query], so you can refer to this for evaluating the response.
 "pass"
 - Appropriate questions for slot filling were asked. (It is not an issue if the 'function call' or 'tool call' item is null.)
+- All additional information needed to fill in the missing required parameter values (which is clearly outlined in the [Ground Truth]) was specifically requested without any omissions.
 "fail" 
 - Tool call missing required information
 - Tool call with incorrect information: Hallucinated values not found in the [Query].
 - Fail of function selection: Called a different, inappropriate function instead of the one that should be called (as can be verified through the [Ground Truth]). 
-- Answered arbitrarily based on their own knowledge without considering the function call. 
+- Answered arbitrarily based on their own knowledge without considering the function call.
+- Slot filling question made with omissions of some required additional information.
+- Redundant question related to information already provided.
 ***
 [END DATA]
 Does the submission meet the criteria? Begin by explaining your reasoning step by step in Korean, without immediately revealing the outcome. Subsequently, on a separate line, clearly indicate whether it is a "pass" or "fail". For clarity, repeat your final decision once more (without quotes or punctuation, literally).