Fix incorrect descriptions of asymptotic notations #7929
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It seems that the current descriptions of the Big O and Big Omega notations reflect a common misconception that they correspond to the worst and best cases of an algorithm. Based on what I've learned from my research, every algorithm can have its best case, worst case, and average case runtimes, and each of these runtimes can be represented by a function. The growth rate of such a function can be constrained by upper and lower bounds, and these bounds are what the Big O and Big Omega notations represent.
This PR rewrites the descriptions of the different asymptotic notations based on the above understanding, while adding a new article that provides a thorough explanation of these concepts. Please feel free to share your views on the changes.