Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add fast eval mode for the testing tool #1353

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2024

Conversation

Peefy
Copy link
Contributor

@Peefy Peefy commented May 23, 2024

1. Does this PR affect any open issues?(Y/N) and add issue references (e.g. "fix #123", "re #123".):

  • N
  • Y
  • feat: add fast eval mode for the testing tool

2. What is the scope of this PR (e.g. component or file name):

  • kclvm/runner/src/lib.rs
  • kclvm/tools/src/testing/suite.rs

Copy link
Contributor

@zong-zhe zong-zhe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Peefy Peefy merged commit 15ba412 into kcl-lang:main May 23, 2024
9 of 10 checks passed
@Peefy Peefy deleted the feat-test-tool-using-fast-eval branch May 23, 2024 05:42
@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

coveralls commented May 23, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9202544643

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

Details

  • 11 of 14 (78.57%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.001%) to 71.067%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
kclvm/tools/src/testing/suite.rs 11 14 78.57%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9189785076: 0.001%
Covered Lines: 53902
Relevant Lines: 75847

💛 - Coveralls

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants