Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test schema response validation #502

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2023
Merged

Conversation

tabotkevin
Copy link
Collaborator

@tabotkevin tabotkevin commented Dec 28, 2023

This is essentially the tests for the @api.ensure decorator.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests

    • Enhanced testing for input schema validation.
    • Introduced tests for Pydantic and Marshmallow response schema validation.
  • Documentation

    • Updated test function names to accurately describe their purpose.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 28, 2023

Walkthrough

The update to the test suite indicates a shift towards incorporating database interactions via SQLAlchemy and enhancing schema validation for both inputs and responses. The renaming of test functions suggests a clearer distinction between input and response validation, while the new functions expand the test coverage to include Pydantic and Marshmallow for response schema validation.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
tests/.../test_responder.py Added SQLAlchemy imports; renamed test functions for input schema validation; added new test functions for Pydantic and Marshmallow response schema validation.

🐇✨
In the burrows of the code, where the data trees grow,
A rabbit hopped in, with new tests in tow.
Schemas for input and response now align,
Ensuring the data, like stars, will rightly shine.
🌟📊

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat with CodeRabbit Bot (@coderabbitai)

  • You can directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • You can tag CodeRabbit on specific lines of code or entire files in the PR by tagging @coderabbitai in a comment. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • You can tag @coderabbitai in a PR comment and ask questions about the PR and the codebase. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 591aa1a and d466676.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/test_responder.py (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 7
tests/test_responder.py (7)
  • 9-10: The addition of SQLAlchemy imports suggests new database interactions are being tested. Ensure that these imports are used within the test suite and that the database interactions are properly mocked or handled to avoid side effects during testing.

  • 1020-1026: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1023-1048]

The new test function test_pydantic_input_schema_validation is added. Ensure that the test covers all relevant cases for input schema validation and that the mocking is correctly implemented to isolate the test environment.

  • 1048-1054: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1051-1074]

The new test function test_marshmallow_input_schema_validation is added. Similar to the Pydantic test, verify that all cases for input schema validation are covered and that the mocking is correctly done.

  • 1144-1167: The SQLAlchemy model and session setup within the test function test_pydantic_response_schema_validation should be reviewed to ensure that it is correctly configured and that the database interactions are properly isolated for testing purposes.

  • 1221-1244: The SQLAlchemy model and session setup within the test function test_marshmallow_response_schema_validation should also be reviewed for correctness and isolation in the test environment.

  • 1184-1218: The test case test_pydantic_response_schema_validation should be reviewed to ensure that the response schema validation is correctly tested and that the test covers all relevant scenarios.

  • 1263-1297: The test case test_marshmallow_response_schema_validation should be reviewed to ensure that the response schema validation is correctly tested and that the test covers all relevant scenarios.

@@ -1018,7 +1020,7 @@ def test_route_without_endpoint(api):
assert route.endpoint_name == "_static_response"


def test_pydantic_schema(api, mocker):
def test_pydantic_input_schema_validation(api, mocker):
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The function test_api_basic_route_overlap is commented out. If this is intentional, consider removing it or adding a TODO/FIXME comment explaining why it's retained. If it's an oversight, it should be uncommented or removed.

@kennethreitz kennethreitz merged commit 612d4e3 into master Dec 30, 2023
2 of 5 checks passed
@kennethreitz kennethreitz deleted the test_response_validation branch December 30, 2023 12:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants