Update dependencies, migration from Snowpack to Vite, some minor fixes

[maxdekrieger]

Updated dependencies (fixes #358):

• Updated Svelte from 3.23 to 3.47
• Updated Svelte-kit accordingly (1.0.0-next.34 to 1.0.0-next.314)
• Updated Svelte static adapter from 1.0.0-next.2 to 1.0.0-next.29
• Removed Snowpack, as Svelte-kit now uses Vite under the hood. Transfered the relevant configuration from Snowpack config to Vite config (embedded in Svelte config)

The CLI no longer has svelte-kit adapt, the adapt step now always happens when a svelte-kit build is executed.

As a bonus, the bumped dependencies make it possible to develop this application on Windows without using a virtual environment.

Minor changes:

• Removed some unused/redundant properties and variable declarations to reduce the Svelte warnings.
• Changed CSS for reputation to fix Reputation view bug, one minor overlap #408

Let me know what you think :)

[maxdekrieger]

@kevinclement @seirl Who should be notified to review this? :)

[seirl]

Thanks, this is awesome. It would be better if @kevinclement reviewed and merged this, I didn't work on this setup at all and I don't really know what I'm looking at. Maybe changing the build system will affect the CD and I have no control over this.

[maxdekrieger]

Sounds reasonable, does @kevinclement check this repository every now and again?

[kevinclement]

sorry for delay here. this looks good, thanks for updating to latest.

[kevinclement]

doh! when this deployed in production it was busted. I'm looking into it, but have to shake off cobwebs since I haven't done this stuff in a while. It looks like the new svelte doesn't produce an index.html in the build directory like the old one, which is probably why it's busted.

[kevinclement]

ok, think I fixed it now :)

[maxdekrieger]

No problems at all, thanks for taking the time 👍😄

Shameless plug; I noticed among friends and guildies that SimpleArmory is the go-to tool nowadays for comparing the amount of mounts someone has, that's why I think it would be nice to expose the logic applied in SimpleArmory in an API. (i opened #428 to discuss this)

[kevinclement]

thanks for the kind words @maxdekrieger. I'm glad the tool is providing value. The fact that it's been a goto has little to do with me recently and everything to do with @seirl and other contributors commitment to keeping the json up to date and curated. It's a labor of love for them for sure. I'll go look at other open item and comment there.