New test case for issue 101 #115
Conversation
| @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . | ||
| @base <http://example.com/rules/> . | ||
|
|
||
| <#CSVWSourceAccess> a rml:Source, csvw:Table; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This needs to become rml:FilePath instead of CSVW because CSVW is RML-IO-REGISTRY.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So this test case needs to be probably in RML-IO-REGISTRY because here we only have 'simple' CSV without any possible configuration. Is quoting with " default for CSV? If yes, we can keep it here though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a question for RML right? I am not sure what is the intended behaviour for an RML source that contains quotes. Should they be referenced?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Well it depends on what the CSV spec says... We use the default behavior in RML-IO while allowing more config options in RML-IO-REGISTRY.
According to the RFC 4180 spec, double quotes is the standard, so the test case can stay here for RML-IO but should also go to RML-IO-REGISTRY where you change the double quotes to single quotes with CSVW. So 1 test case, 2 stones ;)
Fixes #101