Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ESP2 Protocol with Eltako Manufacturer Device Classes #78

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Stoney49th
Copy link

@Stoney49th Stoney49th commented Apr 10, 2018

Core ESP2 parts contributed wich stayed untouched compared to my local stuff. Other examples got stripped down and commited as-is as a usage reference and/or snippet lib for other people.

WARNING: MQTT in examples and message topic names in manufacturer classes. Needs makeover to be more generic.

I suggest that you create a new branch, work from there on and merge the ESP2 stuff when it's cleaned up. I rebased properly so things don't brake... plus, I cloned the classes for handling ESP2 communications. Feel free to re-join them with the existing communicator and serialcommunicator classes with extra mandatory switches for the protocol version. But this is tested in a large installation with over 80 Input Channels and close to 40 actors - also heating and shutters involved and the "multisensor" from eltako.

Thanks for all the work from you guys - the existing codebase for ESP3 was an amazing point to start from.

Core ESP2 parts contributed wich stayed untouched compared to my local stuff. Other examples got stripped down and commited as-is as a usage reference and/or snippet lib for other people.
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 10, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-12.8%) to 78.405% when pulling ab3bdb9 on Stoney49th:stoney_ESP2_mqtt into 839b4ab on kipe:master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-12.8%) to 78.405% when pulling ab3bdb9 on Stoney49th:stoney_ESP2_mqtt into 839b4ab on kipe:master.

@stv0g
Copy link
Contributor

stv0g commented Mar 21, 2019

See discussion in #72

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants