Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add alb support #792

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 28, 2023
Merged

add alb support #792

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 28, 2023

Conversation

jhsinger-klotho
Copy link
Contributor

adds support for configuring load balancers as application load balancers

  • ensures we remove dependencies when clearing properties
  • polls the ready vertices in operational eval in case the ready vertices in teh list are deleted or mutated during an earlier evaluation

Standard checks

  • Unit tests: Any special considerations?
  • Docs: Do we need to update any docs, internal or public?
  • Backwards compatibility: Will this break existing apps? If so, what would be the extra work required to keep them working?

type: list(string)
Listener:
type: resource(aws:load_balancer_listener)
default_value: '{{ upstream "aws:load_balancer" .Self }}'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wouldn't this make the default value the upstream load balancer rather than a listener?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, i didnt think i included this file since its not used yet, miss on my part

Copy link
Contributor

@gordon-klotho gordon-klotho left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Didn't look too closely at templates, tests should verify those work. Code looks good.

Comment on lines 4 to 8
- configuration_rules:
- resource: '{{ .Source }}'
configuration:
field: Certificate
value: '{{ .Target }}'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it weird to have this as a edge config rule instead of an operational rule?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can move it over

@jhsinger-klotho jhsinger-klotho merged commit 7654a53 into main Nov 28, 2023
2 checks passed
@jhsinger-klotho jhsinger-klotho deleted the alb branch November 28, 2023 01:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants