Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix bug with routes #816

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2023
Merged

fix bug with routes #816

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2023

Conversation

jhsinger-klotho
Copy link
Contributor

@jhsinger-klotho jhsinger-klotho commented Dec 11, 2023

closes #814
method should be unique to the integration, we cant make it check the resource field because that wont exist for / route.

Naming needs to ensure there are no conflicts so we will make sure all resource names are different when we are responsible for naming

Standard checks

  • Unit tests: Any special considerations?
  • Docs: Do we need to update any docs, internal or public?
  • Backwards compatibility: Will this break existing apps? If so, what would be the extra work required to keep them working?

@jhsinger-klotho jhsinger-klotho merged commit 76e1fc7 into main Dec 11, 2023
6 checks passed
@jhsinger-klotho jhsinger-klotho deleted the route_bug branch December 11, 2023 16:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

adding routes to api can fail
2 participants