Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

watchlist worker #227

Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

watchlist worker #227

wants to merge 13 commits into from

Conversation

newraina
Copy link
Member

@newraina newraina commented Dec 9, 2023

Ref: #64

test: watchlist.0xxmmvv.workers.dev

APIs:

  • GET /watchlists - list all watchlists
  • POST /watchlists - create watchlist
  • GET /watchlists/:id - get one watchlist
  • PUT /watchlists/:id - update one watchlist (only name can be updated for now)
  • DELETE /watchlists/:id - delete watchlist
  • GET /watchlists/:id/chains/:chain_id/items - list items in watchlist
  • POST /watchlists/:id/chains/:chain_id/items - add to watchlist
  • GET /watchlists/:id/chains/:chain_id/items/:item_id/exists - check if item exists in watchlist
  • DELETE /watchlists/:id/chains/:chain_id/items/:item_id - remove from watchlist

request headers:

  • x-auth-address address of user

@vikiival
Copy link
Member

vikiival commented Dec 9, 2023

Please follow README.md

Copy link
Member

@vikiival vikiival left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does not follow contributing standards

@newraina
Copy link
Member Author

newraina commented Dec 9, 2023

Please follow README.md

@vikiival added the kysely-codegen part and reorganized routes by files.

watchlist/schema.sql Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
watchlist/schema.sql Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@vikiival vikiival left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

~

watchlist/src/utils/validator.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
watchlist/src/utils/validator.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
watchlist/src/routes/watchlist-item.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@vikiival
Copy link
Member

I checked the ref issues and it not written correctly:

Please let me know if something is unclear for you, I can expand

@newraina
Copy link
Member Author

I checked the ref issues and it not written correctly:

Please let me know if something is unclear for you, I can expand

Thanks! will fix them in this week

@newraina
Copy link
Member Author

@vikiival I've overhauled all APIs using a two-entity approach. Given our watchlist UI currently doesn't support multiple watchlists, I introduced a 'default' watchlist for simplicity.

While it may seem like I've created many APIs, only a handful will be used in our UI's initial version:

  • GET /watchlists/default/chains/:chain_id/items - list items in default watchlist
  • POST /watchlists/default/chains/:chain_id/items - add to default watchlist
  • DELETE /watchlists/default/chains/:chain_id/items/:item_id - remove from default watchlist
  • GET /watchlists/default/chains/:chain_id/items/:item_id/exists - check if item exists in default watchlist

watchlist/schema.sql Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines 3 to 10
export function isValidAddress(address: string) {
try {
decodeAddress(address)
return true
} catch (e) {
return false
}
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

try is adress valid from the same package ;))

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changed to use isAddress

Copy link
Member

@vikiival vikiival left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The main problem I have is the default watchlist,

the name of default should be the same as the address :).

and therefore you do not need a ton of checks

@newraina
Copy link
Member Author

newraina commented Jan 29, 2024

the name of default should be the same as the address, and therefore you do not need a ton of checks

@vikiival Could you clarify this for me? Sorry I'm a bit confused how does setting the default watchlist's name as 'address' reduce the number of checks we need to perform?

@vikiival
Copy link
Member

Could you clarify this for me?

there should be no routes with 'default' watchlist. Default watchlist for user should have name = address

E.g. My default watchlist should be 5FFG7GHAR2F2xCb5bqaLQrdgNGdtEL64tYgZimRBHDjuxVuA

reduce the number of checks we need to perform

You are doing a magic in the code to 'handle' is default :)

@newraina
Copy link
Member Author

@vikiival Got it, how about this approach:

The ID of default watchlist = address, rather than the name = address. This means I won't have to look up the ID by name every time I get URLs like /watchlists/5FFG7GHAR2F2x.../*. It helps me avoid having to write code like the example below:

if (req.params.watchlistId === address) {
  // it's user's default watchlist
  const id = findWatchlistIdByName(address)
  ...
}

@vikiival
Copy link
Member

vikiival commented Apr 6, 2024

Sounds good are you planning to continue on this one @newraina ?

@newraina
Copy link
Member Author

newraina commented Apr 6, 2024

@vikiival sure, I can continue in next week

@newraina newraina requested a review from vikiival April 12, 2024 13:56
@newraina
Copy link
Member Author

@vikiival removed all routes associated with the 'default' watchlist. To achieve this, I introduced a new publicId field for the watchlist. The publicId for user-created watchlists is a random string, while the publicId for a user's default watchlist is their address.

publicId will appear in the URL as the identifier ID for the watchlist: GET /watchlists/:public_id/.... Primary key id in the database will be only used to associate watchlist items and not be exposed to the user.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants