Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hidden columns #211

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

PolGuixe
Copy link

Description

Added classes to hide columns:

  • col-xs-hidden
  • col-sm-hidden
  • col-md-hidden
  • col-lg-hidden

Check List

instruction : terminal command

  • run the build script grunt
  • open index.html in a browser & resize to test visual issues

@PolGuixe PolGuixe mentioned this pull request Aug 30, 2016
@lgg
Copy link
Contributor

lgg commented Aug 30, 2016

Maybe change classnames to fit bootstrap API?

@PolGuixe
Copy link
Author

@lgg good point. Done.

@msiemens
Copy link

Any news on this?

@PolGuixe
Copy link
Author

@msiemens I think the branch is good to be merged. Although, there are some problems with Travis. @kristoferjoseph according to Travis it is unable to find the config file.

@Falieson
Copy link

Falieson commented Jan 13, 2017

Citing this PR as the version of flexbox used in my PR roylee0704/react-flexbox-grid#82 to add cols={0} into react-flexbox-grid

@menosprezzi
Copy link

menosprezzi commented Jan 24, 2017

Acording to this link https://travis-ci.org/kristoferjoseph/flexboxgrid/pull_requests, seems like the travis build system is not setup well for all this time @kristoferjoseph. Maybe disable the travis build for this tasks is better

@bgarrant
Copy link

bgarrant commented Feb 2, 2017

Has this been merged into latest branch? I really need a few of these visibility classes.

@lgg
Copy link
Contributor

lgg commented Feb 2, 2017

@bgarrant until this PR isn't merged you can use: https://github.com/lgg/flexboxgrid-helpers

@PolGuixe
Copy link
Author

PolGuixe commented Feb 2, 2017

@kristoferjoseph what do we need to do to get this approved and merged?

@PolGuixe
Copy link
Author

PolGuixe commented Feb 6, 2017

@bgarrant this is the original branch with the hidden classes if you want to use it in the mean time.

@bgarrant
Copy link

bgarrant commented Feb 6, 2017

Thanks PolGuixe and lgg!

@Falieson
Copy link

so what needs to be done to get this PR approved?

@b264
Copy link

b264 commented Feb 16, 2017

We should all decide on a fork to concentrate on if this can't be merged...

@lgg
Copy link
Contributor

lgg commented Feb 18, 2017

ping @kristoferjoseph

@hassanasad
Copy link

hassanasad commented Apr 27, 2017

I think its a dead project now :( - None of the PR's are getting merged nor are any new commits coming in. Can someone please fork and maintain this project?

@b264
Copy link

b264 commented Apr 27, 2017

Do it! and reference this PR so others know about it 😎

@Falieson
Copy link

Falieson commented May 1, 2017

@PolGuixe could you re-submit the PR to my fork ? https://github.com/Falieson/flexboxgrid

@b264 @hassanasad @lgg @kristoferjoseph I'll step up as maintainer, and @thehappyginger will help me

@PolGuixe
Copy link
Author

PolGuixe commented May 1, 2017 via email

@Falieson
Copy link

Falieson commented May 2, 2017

@PolGuixe @b264 @hassanasad

I was able to get ahold of @kristoferjoseph and he has said

  1. this repo is still being actively maintained
  2. all these addon features we want he believes are handled by @lgg 's https://github.com/lgg/flexboxgrid-helpers
  3. these features shouldn't be incorporated into flexboxgrid b/c he wants to keep the package size small

Speak up if you have an issue with this resolution, I may rename my fork something like 'flexboxgrid-extended' if there is good reason to have a combined package but I think everyone should just be able to depend on the 2 packages.

@b264
Copy link

b264 commented May 2, 2017

If #246 merges, that sounds great

@hassanasad
Copy link

@Falieson, @kristoferjoseph seems to have a valid point - However, some of the pull requests (such as XL breakpoint support and few helpers such as this) might not add that much weight to the package and they are kinda like becoming a standard requirement for a grid system.

To be honest, in my personal opinion - when the css grid layout rolls out in main stream browsers some of the code from these packages can be cleared out to bring it back to a very small sized package.

@Falieson
Copy link

Falieson commented May 2, 2017

@hassanasad I agree that I expect some features to be apart of the standard offering, but that's because my first grid was http://materializecss.com/grid.html

@b264
Copy link

b264 commented May 16, 2017

Without at a minimum #246 merging, it does not appear this repo is maintained.

@cyberhck
Copy link

cyberhck commented Aug 2, 2017

Why is this PR not merged? isn't this supposed to be a standard feature? Is this going to get merged or not? If it's not gonna get merged, simply closing the PR would be better, if it's gonna get merged, some activity would have been nice.

@lgg
Copy link
Contributor

lgg commented Aug 2, 2017

@cyberhck check @kristoferjoseph answer here: #211 (comment)

@b264
Copy link

b264 commented Aug 3, 2017

@lgg TL;DR: This repo is unmaintained and abandoned

@cyberhck
Copy link

cyberhck commented Aug 3, 2017

@b264 you seem to be very correct :)

@lgg
Copy link
Contributor

lgg commented Aug 4, 2017

@cyberhck @b264 no, you are wrong. This repo is maintained, but @kristoferjoseph don't want to add current feature to code.

@cyberhck
Copy link

cyberhck commented Aug 4, 2017

@lgg , I was looking for react-flexbox-grid, because of not adding basic feature to this repo, I've to find a entirely new grid library written for react, has visibility classes AND has at least typescript definition.

@b264
Copy link

b264 commented Aug 4, 2017

@lgg Here is part of the !TL;DR version: It's not maintained if a simple documentation clarification #246 can't be merged. There are no reasons to not merge or at least review helpful documentation which has been submitted as a pull request, aside from the repo not being maintained. It really is that simple. Do we want to keep going? Clearly, you have a goal in helping @kristoferjoseph making it look like this is maintained but alas it is not. Why do you fool yourself?
Everything here is write-only. #248 @cyberhck If @kristoferjoseph really feels how he wrote he does, then he, at a minimum, could update documentation, or allow others to update it, indicating that the source code won't ever be changed. But, he doesn't even do that. He does nothing. If you feel that "unmaintained" has some other definition that everyone else here is unaware of, please do clarify exactly what it means. Because my new definition of "unmaintained" is "like kristoferjoseph/flexboxgrid"

TL;DR: This repository is a poster child for a repo being unmaintained.

@hassanasad
Copy link

Please everyone move to https://github.com/evgenyrodionov/flexboxgrid2 its fresh and being maintained.

@imevro
Copy link

imevro commented Aug 16, 2017

Hidden utils classes implemented in flexboxgrid2#7.0.0-alpha7 😌

@cyberhck
Copy link

@b264 You're absolutely correct, this repo is not maintained. There's not a single comment on #246 or this PR from owner of this repo. Who's maintaining it then? And last commit was almost 8 months ago as of this writing. That's the definition of not being maintained.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants