Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tproxy: support named port #4487

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 9, 2024
Merged

Conversation

zhangzujian
Copy link
Member

Pull Request

What type of this PR

Examples of user facing changes:

  • Features
  • Bug fixes
  • Docs
  • Tests

Which issue(s) this PR fixes

Fixes #4331

@zhangzujian zhangzujian marked this pull request as ready for review September 6, 2024 08:22
@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 6, 2024
@dosubot dosubot bot added feature New network feature go Pull requests that update Go code test automation tests labels Sep 6, 2024
Signed-off-by: zhangzujian <[email protected]>
@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Sep 9, 2024
@zhangzujian zhangzujian merged commit 5391b80 into kubeovn:master Sep 9, 2024
61 of 62 checks passed
@zhangzujian zhangzujian deleted the fix-tproxy branch September 9, 2024 05:36
zhangzujian added a commit to zhangzujian/kube-ovn that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2024
liyh-yusur pushed a commit to liyh-yusur/kube-ovn that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2024
Signed-off-by: zhangzujian <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: liyh <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New network feature go Pull requests that update Go code lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer need backport size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. test automation tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] TPROXY fails to add iptables rules if probe use a named port
2 participants