-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 808
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Add parameters for tuning revisionHistoryLimit and emptyDir volumes #1840
fix: Add parameters for tuning revisionHistoryLimit and emptyDir volumes #1840
Conversation
Welcome @bodgit! |
Hi @bodgit. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/ok-to-test |
/retest |
I'm not sure why this test is failing. Any ideas? |
@bodgit See details here #1858 (comment). The failure is not related to this PR. |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
Signed-off-by: Matt Dainty <[email protected]>
2e8b25c
to
46efcf6
Compare
I still don't understand why this test is failing. The pertinent error seems to be:
but it's not obvious what that YAML looks like. If I render the I can't see where the tests are defined to try and pick through those. |
Is this #1864 by any chance? |
Adding some logic guards to ensure the new parameters are set seems to have fixed this, indeed related to #1864. Ping @AndrewSirenko @torredil |
Code Coverage Diff
|
Thank you for contribution (and the fix @bodgit), it looks good to me, will let @torredil or @ConnorJC3 approve. |
/lgtm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @bodgit
/lgtm
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: torredil The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Is this a bug fix or adding new feature?
Helm chart feature.
What is this PR about? / Why do we need it?
This PR adds chart parameters to tune the
revisionHistoryLimit
on the Deployment & DaemonSet and also to tune theemptyDir
volumes used for sockets and probes, (setsizeLimit
,medium
, etc.).Default values match the implicit Kubernetes default (in the case of
revisionHistoryLimit
) or match the original hardcoded value.What testing is done?
Generated manifests only show the addition of the (now explicit) default
revisionHistoryLimit
, volumes remain unchanged.