Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

📖 refactor: finalizer in CronJob example #4397

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

📖 refactor: finalizer in CronJob example #4397

Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
99da1bb
refactor: finalizer example
lorenzofelletti Nov 19, 2024
5bdafe0
refactor: finalizer example to re-fetch after updating resource
lorenzofelletti Nov 25, 2024
c767eca
feat: add status condition to CronJob example
lorenzofelletti Nov 28, 2024
44088d9
fix: remove double reference
lorenzofelletti Dec 10, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
15 changes: 14 additions & 1 deletion docs/book/src/cronjob-tutorial/testdata/finalizer_example.go
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -67,10 +67,23 @@ func (r *CronJobReconciler) Reconcile(ctx context.Context, req ctrl.Request) (ct
// then lets add the finalizer and update the object. This is equivalent
// to registering our finalizer.
if !controllerutil.ContainsFinalizer(cronJob, myFinalizerName) {
controllerutil.AddFinalizer(cronJob, myFinalizerName)
log.Info("Adding Finalizer for CronJob")
if ok := controllerutil.AddFinalizer(cronJob, myFinalizerName); !ok {
log.Error(err, "Failed to add finalizer into the custom resource")
return ctrl.Result{Requeue: true}, nil
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would not be semantically better to error out here? For example

return ctrl.Result{}, fmt.Errorf("message")

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have no error acctually, right?
The code should create an error and then return as you suggested
@mateusoliveira43 would you like to help us by doing this change in the deploy image plugin?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sure, will try to make changes there

}

if err := r.Update(ctx, cronJob); err != nil {
return ctrl.Result{}, err
}

// we re-fetch after having updated the CronJob, so that we have the latest
// state of the resource, and avoid the error "the object has been modified,
// please apply your changes to the latest version and try again".
if err := r.Get(ctx, req.NamespacedName, cronJob); err != nil {
log.Error(err, "unable to fetch CronJob")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would be better to say re-fetch here?

return ctrl.Result{}, client.IgnoreNotFound(err)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would not be better to always error out here?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes you are right. We need to change it in the deploy image too.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

may I ask why? If in the meantime the resource was deleted shouldn't that be ignored?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On top we should have : https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder/blob/cbc6e383c342f1337ab37ee4aa0755957a01f9c7/testdata/project-v4-with-plugins/internal/controller/busybox_controller.go#L84C2-L99C3

If the resource is deleted, then the reconciliation stop at this point.

What we need to do is fix the tutorials to have the structure of https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder/blob/master/testdata/project-v4-with-plugins/internal/controller/busybox_controller.go

The changes here seems for me either incomplete if we address only the finalizer

}
Copy link
Member

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 Nov 27, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the contribution 🥇

See that:

We need to change the code under hack/docs so that when we run make generate-docs we re-scaffold all and just add the right code on top to ensure that all is always updated.

Therefore, can you please add the code there and run the command to ensure that all is fine?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indeed it will result in multi-version and crojob tutorial changed when you run make generate-docs

}
} else {
// The object is being deleted
Expand Down