Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Implement egress traffic CIDRGroup object #205

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Implement egress traffic CIDRGroup object #205

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

tssurya
Copy link
Contributor

@tssurya tssurya commented Mar 3, 2024

No description provided.

@tssurya
Split peers into ingress&&egress
81a0070 
This resulted from discussions in network-policy-api
meetings and after consulting apiserver team for best
practices.
So far ingress and egress peer expressions were symmetric.
However moving forward, since we are adding support for
egress (northbound) peers and fqdn which might have
differences compared to what we want to allow for ingress,
we have decided to split the peers into ingress and egress.

Signed-off-by: Surya Seetharaman <[email protected]>
@tssurya
Add support for selecting nodes as egress peers
2d2967b 
Some FTR things:

1) As an egress peer a user can selector either namespaces, or pods or nodes.
In a given rule more than 1 type of selection is not allowed.
2) An empty node selector means it selects all nodes in the cluster.
3) nodes can be referred only from egress rule peers, since we only
support northbound use cases.

Signed-off-by: Surya Seetharaman <[email protected]>
@tssurya
Add support for selecting external destinations as egress peers
f1c750c 
Some FTR things:

    1) As an egress peer a user can selector either namespaces, or pods or
       nodes or externalNetworks.
    In a given rule more than 1 type of selection is not allowed.
    2) An empty externalNetworks selector means it selects all externalNetworkSets in the cluster.
    3) externalNetworks can be set only from to.Peer

Signed-off-by: Surya Seetharaman <[email protected]>
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 3, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: tssurya
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign dyanngg for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Mar 3, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 3, 2024
@netlify Netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 3, 2024 •
edited
Loading

✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-network-policy-api ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit f1c750c
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-network-policy-api/deploys/65e485e21fe8550008731965
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-205--kubernetes-sigs-network-policy-api.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@tssurya tssurya changed the title Implement egress traffic ExternalNetworks object Implement egress traffic CIDRGroup object Mar 4, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 2, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jul 2, 2024
@astoycos
Copy link
Member

astoycos commented Jul 2, 2024

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Jul 2, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 30, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Oct 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@astoycos astoycos Awaiting requested review from astoycos

@danwinship danwinship Awaiting requested review from danwinship

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@tssurya @k8s-ci-robot @k8s-triage-robot @astoycos