-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update "KEP-4368 Job API managed-by mechanism" targeting Beta in 1.32 #4856
Update "KEP-4368 Job API managed-by mechanism" targeting Beta in 1.32 #4856
Conversation
fd70a3a
to
dbe6e01
Compare
/cc @wojtek-t |
/cc @soltysh |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Two small comments from PRR perspective - other than that LGTM.
dbe6e01
to
8fa4e67
Compare
/cc @tenzen-y @andreyvelich @ahg-g @danielvegamyhre |
@mimowo: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: andreyvelich. Note that only kubernetes members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/approve PRR |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the update!
lgtm
@@ -1100,6 +1110,26 @@ Why should this KEP _not_ be implemented? | |||
|
|||
## Alternatives | |||
|
|||
### Skip reconciliation in the event handler |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for reflecting on our previous discussions here.
Thanks for updating us on this @mimowo. LGTM |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for driving this @mimowo!
Just a small nit.
Co-authored-by: Andrey Velichkevich <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
/label tide/merge-method-squash
These projects for now follow the decision taken in the core k8s to make the | ||
field immutable to avoid complication of the support for mutability. | ||
|
||
All together, we decide to keep the field immutable. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: mimowo, soltysh, wojtek-t The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
One-line PR description: Update the KEP to prepare for update to Beta in 1.32
Issue link: #4368
Other comments:
Graduation criteria:
* Kueue test PR: WIP: Run Kueue e2e tests with JobManagedBy enabled [TEST ONLY] kubernetes-sigs/kueue#3074 (5 runs, all passed on 1.30 & 1.31 with JobManagedBy enabled)