Skip to content

[KEP-4680] Update README to include configurable HealhCheckTimeout #5476

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor

  • One-line PR description:

Update KEP 4680 README to include configurable HealthCheck into the DRA API

  • Issue link:
  • Other comments:

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Aug 13, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/kep Categorizes KEP tracking issues and PRs modifying the KEP directory sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. labels Aug 13, 2025
@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @SergeyKanzhelev @Jpsassine

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 13, 2025
… message

- Added health_check_timeout_seconds field to DeviceHealth message
- Updated documentation to reflect that timeout is now configurable per device
- Changed Beta graduation criteria from 'implement' to 'verify' since feature is now included in initial design
- Addresses PR feedback about DRA API for timeout configuration

Signed-off-by: Carlos Eduardo Arango Gutierrez <[email protected]>
// Health check timeout duration in seconds for this device.
// If not specified or zero, Kubelet will use a default timeout.
// Optional.
int64 health_check_timeout_seconds = 5;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What would the negative value or 0 mean? Let's specify in the field description.

// Health check timeout duration in seconds for this device.
// If not specified or zero, Kubelet will use a default timeout.
// Optional.
int64 health_check_timeout_seconds = 5;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

qq for PR review I think - is Duration field OK to use in our APIs? Or this is not recommended?

Copy link
Member

@SergeyKanzhelev SergeyKanzhelev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

we need to specify the behvior when negative value was set. Can do it during implementation

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 14, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ArangoGutierrez, SergeyKanzhelev
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign mrunalp for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @mrunalp

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/kep Categorizes KEP tracking issues and PRs modifying the KEP directory lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants