Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: get all services #2367

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 15, 2024
Merged

feat: get all services #2367

merged 5 commits into from
Apr 15, 2024

Conversation

tedim52
Copy link
Contributor

@tedim52 tedim52 commented Apr 10, 2024

Description

lots_of_services = import_module(".../main.star")

def run(plan.args):
   lots_of_services.run(plan, args)
   services = plan.get_services()
   for service in services:
        <do smth>

Is this change user facing?

YES

References

#2349

@tedim52 tedim52 enabled auto-merge April 15, 2024 15:09
@tedim52 tedim52 added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 15, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 2ba98f5 Apr 15, 2024
56 checks passed
@tedim52 tedim52 deleted the tedi/getservices branch April 15, 2024 16:13
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[0.88.17](0.88.16...0.88.17)
(2024-04-15)


### Features

* Add reason argument to the cancel subscription method
([#2377](#2377))
([dd8d1ff](dd8d1ff))
* change made with to star us on
([#2375](#2375))
([56677a1](56677a1))
* get all services
([#2367](#2367))
([2ba98f5](2ba98f5))


### Bug Fixes

* Use instance `updated at` attribute for uptime calculation
([#2378](#2378))
([421d275](421d275))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

---------

Co-authored-by: kurtosisbot <[email protected]>
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
## Description
Adds docs for `get_services` instruction.

## Is this change user facing?
YES

## References
#2367
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants