-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: adding the starlark run
repository to maintain this data after an APIC restart
#2452
Conversation
starlark run
repository to have this data after an APIC restartstarlark run
repository to mantain this data after an APIC restart
starlark run
repository to mantain this data after an APIC restartstarlark run
repository to maintain this data after an APIC restart
I will review this change tomorrow. I need a bit more time to ramp-up on the concept of APIC repositories. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tedim52 Should you take a look since you made some recent changed related to the Starlark run?
Hey @leoporoli ! curious, why is the starlark run information required after APIC restart? Do you plan on using it to run the same starlark against an enclave to restart it? |
Hey, @tedim52, well I realized that we had to persist it because the |
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [0.89.11](0.89.10...0.89.11) (2024-05-22) ### Features * adding the `starlark run` repository to maintain this data after an APIC restart ([#2452](#2452)) ([7bad2a9](7bad2a9)) * display task names in picasso ([#2458](#2458)) ([424dc39](424dc39)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). --------- Co-authored-by: kurtosisbot <[email protected]>
Description
adding the
starlark run
repository to have this data after an APIC restartREMINDER: Tag Reviewers, so they get notified to review
Is this change user facing?
NO
References (if applicable)