add missing rule for stwo programs in make test

[FrancoGiachetta]

TITLE

Description

make test is failing because it is missing the rule for stwo programs, preventing it from compiling them before executing test and thus failing. This PR adds that rule to it.

Checklist

• Linked to Github Issue
• Unit tests added
• Integration tests added.
• This change requires new documentation.
  • Documentation has been added/updated.
  • CHANGELOG has been updated.

[github-actions]

**Hyper Thereading Benchmark results**




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     27.616 s ±  0.343 s    [User: 26.830 s, System: 0.785 s]
  Range (min … max):   27.373 s … 27.859 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     27.507 s ±  0.391 s    [User: 26.747 s, System: 0.758 s]
  Range (min … max):   27.231 s … 27.783 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 1 ran
    1.00 ± 0.02 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 1




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     15.296 s ±  0.087 s    [User: 26.763 s, System: 0.807 s]
  Range (min … max):   15.235 s … 15.358 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     15.265 s ±  0.067 s    [User: 26.712 s, System: 0.790 s]
  Range (min … max):   15.218 s … 15.313 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 2 ran
    1.00 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 2




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     11.334 s ±  0.177 s    [User: 39.606 s, System: 0.964 s]
  Range (min … max):   11.209 s … 11.459 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     11.226 s ±  0.353 s    [User: 39.504 s, System: 0.934 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.976 s … 11.475 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 4 ran
    1.01 ± 0.04 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 4




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.754 s ±  0.284 s    [User: 39.881 s, System: 0.945 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.553 s … 10.954 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.694 s ±  0.168 s    [User: 40.102 s, System: 0.969 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.575 s … 10.813 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 6 ran
    1.01 ± 0.03 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 6




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.972 s ±  0.055 s    [User: 40.269 s, System: 0.998 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.933 s … 11.011 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.763 s ±  0.007 s    [User: 40.002 s, System: 1.013 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.758 s … 10.768 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 8 ran
    1.02 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 8




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.705 s ±  0.079 s    [User: 40.720 s, System: 1.088 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.649 s … 10.761 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.862 s ±  0.076 s    [User: 40.331 s, System: 1.091 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.808 s … 10.915 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 16 ran
    1.01 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 16

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for unmodified programs 🚀

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_factorial	2.230 ± 0.010	2.214	2.242	1.00 ± 0.01
head big_factorial	2.227 ± 0.023	2.191	2.262	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_fibonacci	2.164 ± 0.013	2.147	2.182	1.00
head big_fibonacci	2.175 ± 0.022	2.147	2.221	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base blake2s_integration_benchmark	8.325 ± 0.054	8.243	8.421	1.00
head blake2s_integration_benchmark	8.341 ± 0.102	8.126	8.530	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base compare_arrays_200000	2.301 ± 0.018	2.271	2.328	1.00 ± 0.01
head compare_arrays_200000	2.296 ± 0.016	2.275	2.324	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base dict_integration_benchmark	1.497 ± 0.004	1.493	1.504	1.00
head dict_integration_benchmark	1.503 ± 0.010	1.492	1.520	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.295 ± 0.012	1.273	1.311	1.00 ± 0.01
head field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.294 ± 0.011	1.281	1.317	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base integration_builtins	8.363 ± 0.094	8.182	8.468	1.00
head integration_builtins	8.370 ± 0.160	8.178	8.586	1.00 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base keccak_integration_benchmark	8.590 ± 0.096	8.423	8.703	1.00 ± 0.02
head keccak_integration_benchmark	8.580 ± 0.119	8.402	8.742	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base linear_search	2.287 ± 0.011	2.268	2.298	1.00
head linear_search	2.289 ± 0.016	2.257	2.310	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.577 ± 0.010	1.565	1.596	1.00 ± 0.01
head math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.575 ± 0.004	1.569	1.583	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_integration_benchmark	1.529 ± 0.005	1.518	1.536	1.00 ± 0.01
head math_integration_benchmark	1.528 ± 0.007	1.517	1.539	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base memory_integration_benchmark	1.264 ± 0.005	1.258	1.271	1.00
head memory_integration_benchmark	1.267 ± 0.004	1.261	1.275	1.00 ± 0.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.641 ± 0.007	1.631	1.650	1.00 ± 0.01
head operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.633 ± 0.007	1.623	1.642	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base pedersen	548.6 ± 2.8	546.8	556.3	1.00
head pedersen	548.6 ± 4.0	544.9	558.9	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base poseidon_integration_benchmark	649.5 ± 4.6	640.5	657.0	1.00
head poseidon_integration_benchmark	650.9 ± 6.7	642.3	666.8	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base secp_integration_benchmark	1.908 ± 0.007	1.897	1.917	1.00
head secp_integration_benchmark	1.915 ± 0.010	1.900	1.933	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base set_integration_benchmark	639.6 ± 1.3	637.5	642.0	1.00
head set_integration_benchmark	645.6 ± 8.6	638.6	662.1	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base uint256_integration_benchmark	4.521 ± 0.049	4.449	4.598	1.00
head uint256_integration_benchmark	4.532 ± 0.053	4.450	4.587	1.00 ± 0.02

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.39%. Comparing base (7a97bed) to head (3e10d78).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1962   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.39%   96.39%           
=======================================
  Files         102      102           
  Lines       41566    41566           
=======================================
  Hits        40068    40068           
  Misses       1498     1498           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[YairVaknin-starkware]

HI @JulianGCalderon and @FrancoGiachetta
Looks like we were working on the same thing (partially).
Pls TAL here: #1963. PLS review it and let's merge it instead (contains a bit more things we need).

[FrancoGiachetta]

Hi @YairVaknin-starkware! Thanks for notifying, I'll close this PR then.