Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add basic test setup for era_vm #229

Closed
wants to merge 27 commits into from

Conversation

MarcosNicolau
Copy link

@MarcosNicolau MarcosNicolau commented Aug 13, 2024

What ❔

This pr enables the tests under this folder to the lambda_vm. Merge once this pr gets merged.

Why ❔

This is to ensure all tests pass in the lambda_vm.

Checklist

  • PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs).
  • Tests for the changes have been added / updated.
  • Documentation comments have been added / updated.
  • Code has been formatted via zk fmt and zk lint.

@MarcosNicolau MarcosNicolau marked this pull request as ready for review August 13, 2024 18:51
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ zk_evm_1_4_0.workspace = true
zk_evm_1_3_3.workspace = true
zk_evm_1_3_1.workspace = true
vm2.workspace = true
era_vm = {path = "../../../../"}
era_vm = { path = "../../../../era_vm" }
Copy link

@fkrause98 fkrause98 Aug 16, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will not work when zksync-era is used as a submodule for era_vm, believe me I've tried. Please restore this.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When developing, we can modify this as needed.

@juan518munoz juan518munoz marked this pull request as draft August 16, 2024 15:17
@juan518munoz juan518munoz changed the base branch from era_vm_integration_v2 to pubdata-refunds-adapt August 16, 2024 15:33
Base automatically changed from pubdata-refunds-adapt to era_vm_integration_v2 August 16, 2024 16:03
@MarcosNicolau
Copy link
Author

Closing this one in favor of #234.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants