Benchmarking against nlp_uk #5
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- --line-by-line is now opt-in - options to choose iterators and their hyperparams for benchmarking
proger
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I benchmarked three branches (
main,experimentsand #4) with this patch on a file with 100k lines.I got the best results with code from #4 using
AccurateSrxTextIteratorclocked at 141.82s.tokenize_textfrom nlp_uk clocks at 54.58s. If I disable word segmentation (remove-u -w) nlp_uk clocks at 35.324s.This code generates a bit less sentences on that dataset: 84452 from nlp_uk vs 84018 in choppa. See sentence-wise diff.
Here's the full log: https://gist.github.com/proger/2fa3ead52dc78b7d582cd356d9f423e9