-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New quantum dynamics mod. #77
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please use a real email address for your commit.
src/prg_quantumdynamics_mod.F90
Outdated
call bml_convert_from_dense(matrix_type, a_dense, a, convert_threshold,asize) | ||
!write(*,*)"thr,sparsity ",sparsity_threshold, bml_get_sparsity(a, sparsity_threshold) | ||
call bml_convert_from_dense(matrix_type, a_dense, a, thresh,asize) | ||
!write(*,*)"thr,sparsity ",thresh, bml_get_sparsity(a, thresh) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please remove this comment.
src/prg_quantumdynamics_mod.F90
Outdated
call bml_convert_from_dense(matrix_type,a_dense,a,convert_threshold,asize) | ||
!write(*,*)"thr,sparsity ", sparsity_threshold,bml_get_sparsity(a,sparsity_threshold) | ||
call bml_convert_from_dense(matrix_type,a_dense,a,thresh,asize) | ||
!write(*,*)"thr,sparsity ", thresh,bml_get_sparsity(a,thresh) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please remove.
Thanks! |
src/prg_quantumdynamics_mod.F90
Outdated
call bml_multiply(aux_bml,rho_bml,aux_1,1.0_dp,0.0_dp,thresh) | ||
call bml_multiply(rho_bml,H,aux_bml,1.0_dp,0.0_dp,thresh) | ||
call bml_multiply(aux_bml,sinv_bml,aux_1,-1.0_dp,1.0d0) | ||
call bml_scale(dR,aux_1,aux_bml) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The compilation is failing here in this line. Ah, ok, sorry, that's my fault. I need to update the test environment with the new version of the bml. I'll re-run this test after I am done with that.
The |
@grindstaff1 CI is still failing here: http://logs.suse.provo.cloud/47/147/18/check/ardana-standard-vagrant-integration-test/2843815/logs/ansible.log. You should verify that the energy differences are ok and then update the reference. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please verify the energies of the failed CI test.
Hi Nick, this might be caused by something else maybe at the bml level
cause we are only mdif a mod that is never being tested. Can we trigger a
build of the master branch to see if the ci fails?
On Aug 14, 2017 10:43, "Nicolas Bock" <[email protected]> wrote:
*@nicolasbock* requested changes on this pull request.
Please verify the energies of the failed CI test.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#77 (review)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APQltZ9yxc2OaYtxeKFluzDNuxUA8a2rks5sYHkggaJpZM4Os0lV>
.
|
Hi @cnegre, that's a good point. I have triggered a test of the master. Let's see if that passes or fails. I'll open an issue if it's not passing. |
Please see #79 |
New qd mod without matrix redundant definitions.
Deleted commutate submodule.
Submitted with correct email (I believe.)
This change is