-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
docs: Add summary of the current performance measurement
This adds a document that summarizes our experiment to measure performance impact of applications being audited. Signed-off-by: Daiki Ueno <[email protected]>
- Loading branch information
Showing
2 changed files
with
76 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ | ||
# Measuring performance impact | ||
|
||
## Summary | ||
|
||
The applications being audited are attached an eBPF program, which | ||
impacts performance. We conducted an experiment to measure | ||
performance, which this document tries to summarize. | ||
|
||
## Testing environment | ||
|
||
The experiment was conducted on a typical workstation environment | ||
running Fedora Linux: | ||
|
||
- Hardware: Intel Core i7-1185G7 @ 3.00GHz, 8 core CPU, 32GB memory | ||
- OS: Fedora 38 with Linux kernel 6.4.11-200.fc38.x86_64 | ||
|
||
The following additional components were installed: | ||
|
||
- crypto-auditing: b682180a92abb5abe98177f6e9045820bbdfcf01 checkout, built with io\_uring enabled | ||
- gnutls: 3.8.0-9.fc39.1 from [COPR](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ueno/crypto-auditing/) | ||
|
||
## Testing scenarios | ||
|
||
The TLS handshake benchmark | ||
[program](https://gitlab.com/dueno/benchmark-handshake) is capable of | ||
performing TLS handshake on a memory-based transport instead of | ||
sockets. | ||
|
||
We use this program to perform TLS 1.3 handshake 10000 times, | ||
utilizing all CPU cores available to the operating system. | ||
|
||
The following commands were used: | ||
|
||
```console | ||
$ sudo sysctl -w kernel.perf_event_paranoid=-1 | ||
$ perf stat ./benchmark-handshake -c 10000 -p $(nproc) --priority NORMAL | ||
``` | ||
|
||
To measure the impact of context switches, where we expect | ||
`crypto-auditing-agent` and the applications to contend each other | ||
with the available CPU, we emulated a single core system with the | ||
kernel parameter `nr_cpus=1`. | ||
|
||
## Results | ||
|
||
### Overall time spent | ||
|
||
- When running with 8 cores, there is no visible difference in overall | ||
time spent, regardless of `crypto-auditing-agent` attaching eBPF | ||
program | ||
- When running with a single core, there is approximately 4% | ||
degradation in overall time spent, when running the benchmark | ||
program with `crypto-auditing-agent` enabled | ||
|
||
### Context switches | ||
|
||
- When running with 8 cores, there are 7.67 times more context | ||
switches observed when `crypto-auditing-agent` is enabled | ||
- When running on a single core, there are 3.69 times more context | ||
switches when `crypto-auditing-agent` is enabled. | ||
|
||
### Interpretation | ||
|
||
We currently conclude the performance impact is negligible in terms of | ||
overall time. This is mainly because we use eBPF ringbuffer without | ||
any synchronization, and in userspace the data is also asynchronously | ||
written to disk using io\_uring. That means that some events might be | ||
missed, depending on the configured size of ringbuffer. | ||
|
||
While there are a number of context switches observed, they don't seem | ||
to contribute much to the overall time spent. As the benchmark | ||
program uses the memory-based transport (and therefore, no system | ||
calls and no context switches) and no I/O operations are involved, we | ||
expect that the performance impact would be more negligible in | ||
practical applications. |