Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Footmisc bug 19 #1701

Open
wants to merge 67 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Footmisc bug 19 #1701

wants to merge 67 commits into from

Conversation

FrankMittelbach
Copy link
Member

Internal housekeeping

Status of pull request

  • Ready to merge

Checklist of required changes before merge will be approved

  • Test file(s) added
  • Version and date string updated in changed source files
  • Relevant \changes entries in source included
  • Relevant changes.txt updated
  • Rollback provided (if necessary)?
  • [n/a] ltnewsX.tex (and/or latexchanges.tex) updated

This fixes a bug reported for footmisc

FrankMittelbach/fmitex-footmisc#19

but is also present in the kernel code

@FrankMittelbach
Copy link
Member Author

If you happen to look at the last commit @CastleStar14654 please ignore it, I must have been already asleep when I wrote that nonsense. But now it is too late and I wil fix/revert it tomorrow

Copy link
Member

@davidcarlisle davidcarlisle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good, but still possibly merge the baseline attach sockets

previous behavior, they are by default both \plug{off}. One probably
wants to set them both to \plug{on} or both to \plug{off}, but for
maximum flexibility the two can be individually changed.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I (think) I'd lean towards combining these.

Copy link
Member Author

@FrankMittelbach FrankMittelbach Mar 29, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it sure is possible to merge the two and in fact I'm also leaning towards that since everything else seems artifical, but without feedback I thought I stay with both.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants