Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prototype workflow to use AI to extract judgment details #2100

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 14, 2024
Merged

Conversation

longhotsummer
Copy link
Contributor

@longhotsummer longhotsummer commented Oct 11, 2024

Once configured, the user goes to /admin/peachjam/judgment/upload/ and uploads a file. It calls a Laws.Africa API which returns metadata for the judgment. The judgment is created and the user must make any edits.

https://www.loom.com/share/b9037635acb7491195a9915191745d7a

Also:

  • move key fields for judgments "above the fold" rather than having, for example, outcomes above date
  • move serial number stuff into work identification tab, since it isn't critical 90% of the time
  • the CITATOR_API_KEY setting will be merged into LAWSAFRICA_API_KEY instead which covers all Laws.Africa APIs

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 11, 2024

Test Results

51 tests  ±0   51 ✅ ±0   10s ⏱️ -2s
13 suites ±0    0 💤 ±0 
13 files   ±0    0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 6f24187. ± Comparison against base commit fe113af.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@longhotsummer longhotsummer merged commit 661d4b1 into main Oct 14, 2024
9 checks passed
@longhotsummer longhotsummer deleted the extractor branch October 14, 2024 11:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant