Correct predicate for admin unit classification

[piemonkey]

Overview

Discovered when working on creating decision templates in RB.

connected issues and PRs:

#77

Setup

N/A

How to test/reproduce

Sparql query for the data or look in fct?

Challenges/uncertainties

This hasn't been thoroughly tested as the functionality that required it isn't actually needed. Maybe it should have been a draft?

Checks PR readiness

• UI: works on smaller screen sizes
• UI: feedback for any loading/error states
• Check cancel/go-back flows
• Check database state correct when deleting/updating (especially regarding relationships)
• changelog
• no new deprecations

[abeforgit]

@piemonkey can you just elaborate a tiny bit on what the problem was/is? I have a vague sense but not entirely sure

[piemonkey]

It's been a while... Honestly, I can't do much better than the changeset and linking to a rocketchat conversation.

From that conversation, the problem was when I was trying to get RB to correctly display the right decision types for the administrative unit of the logged in user. It later turned out that we didn't want to do this, so I removed the front-end part, but thought I'd correct the data model anyway as I had already done that locally. So this PR is essentially just correcting some incorrect data that could potentially cause problems later if not fixed.