Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Update silavong2021deskew.markdown
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
learning2hash committed May 22, 2024
1 parent d65cbe5 commit 29ae109
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion _publications/silavong2021deskew.markdown
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -7,6 +7,6 @@ year: 2021
bibkey: silavong2021deskew
additional_links:
- {name: "PDF", url: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.04473"}
tags: ["MSR", "LSH"]
tags: ["MSR", "LSH", "Text Retrieval"]
---
Machine learning on source code (MLOnCode) is a popular research field that has been driven by the availability of large-scale code repositories and the development of powerful probabilistic and deep learning models for mining source code. Code-to-code recommendation is a task in MLOnCode that aims to recommend relevant, diverse and concise code snippets that usefully extend the code currently being written by a developer in their development environment (IDE). Code-to-code recommendation engines hold the promise of increasing developer productivity by reducing context switching from the IDE and increasing code-reuse. Existing code-to-code recommendation engines do not scale gracefully to large codebases, exhibiting a linear growth in query time as the code repository increases in size. In addition, existing code-to-code recommendation engines fail to account for the global statistics of code repositories in the ranking function, such as the distribution of code snippet lengths, leading to sub-optimal retrieval results. We address both of these weaknesses with \emph{Senatus}, a new code-to-code recommendation engine. At the core of Senatus is \emph{De-Skew} LSH a new locality sensitive hashing (LSH) algorithm that indexes the data for fast (sub-linear time) retrieval while also counteracting the skewness in the snippet length distribution using novel abstract syntax tree-based feature scoring and selection algorithms. We evaluate Senatus via automatic evaluation and with an expert developer user study and find the recommendations to be of higher quality than competing baselines, while achieving faster search. For example, on the CodeSearchNet dataset we show that Senatus improves performance by 6.7% F1 and query time 16x is faster compared to Facebook Aroma on the task of code-to-code recommendation.

0 comments on commit 29ae109

Please sign in to comment.