Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FL Aquatic Preserves #64

Open
emjaymur opened this issue Feb 4, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

FL Aquatic Preserves #64

emjaymur opened this issue Feb 4, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
bug land manager work related to supporting the land manager accounts

Comments

@emjaymur
Copy link

emjaymur commented Feb 4, 2019

From what I can tell, the only sites in the "aquatic preserve" user group are only sites found in National Estuarine Research Reserves located in Apalachicola, Naples and St. Augustine/Palm Coast. It does not include aquatic preserves from throughout the state.

@emjaymur emjaymur added the bug label Feb 4, 2019
@mradamcox
Copy link
Contributor

@kkemp85 Whenever you have a minute, could you re-examine this ticket and see if it's still an issue? A lot has happened since it was first created.

@kkemp85
Copy link
Collaborator

kkemp85 commented Mar 11, 2020

@mradamcox I think this issue will warrant a little more discussion. I couldn't even find any Aquatic Preserve accounts to even check this. So I created a dummy account and added the FL_AquaticPreserve group to it. It looks like what Emily Jane is saying is that the group doesn't contain all the sites within the aquatic preserve boundaries around the state. This could be an issue with overlapping jurisdictions (sites are in both an aquatic preserve and a state park or state forest for example) so maybe that's why when you created the group and coded it like the other state accounts, it didn't work properly. Ideally, Aquatic Preserve accounts would be set up just like other state agency accounts, but the overlap with other agencies may have caused an issue, I don't know. For our grant, we cannot monitor within aquatic preserves, but we should still set up these accounts for the aquatic preserve managers to use if they wish. I will need to discuss this with Emily Jane a bit further and get back to you. I won't be sure what the next step is until I do.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug land manager work related to supporting the land manager accounts
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants