Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add additional boost endpoints #142

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 1, 2023

Conversation

ayushtom
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@ayushtom ayushtom added the 🔥 Ready for review This pull request needs a review label Nov 30, 2023
@ayushtom ayushtom self-assigned this Nov 30, 2023
@ayushtom ayushtom changed the title feat: add new boost endpoints feat: add additional boost endpoints Nov 30, 2023
@Th0rgal Th0rgal added ❌ Change request Change requested from reviewer and removed 🔥 Ready for review This pull request needs a review labels Dec 1, 2023
"$map": doc! {
"input": "$quest_list",
"as": "item",
"in": doc! {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If those are the same, could you try to use "$mergeObjects": ["$$item"]?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

@ayushtom ayushtom requested a review from Th0rgal December 1, 2023 10:29
@ayushtom ayushtom added 🔥 Ready for review This pull request needs a review and removed ❌ Change request Change requested from reviewer labels Dec 1, 2023
Copy link
Member

@Th0rgal Th0rgal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@Th0rgal Th0rgal merged commit 6fda5b7 into master Dec 1, 2023
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🔥 Ready for review This pull request needs a review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants