for test

Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <[email protected]>

server/schedule/checker/rule_checker.go

@@ -451,23 +451,28 @@ func (c *RuleChecker) fixOrphanPeers(region *core.RegionInfo, fit *placement.Reg
 		checkerCounter.WithLabelValues("rule_checker", "remove-orphan-peer").Inc()
 		return operator.CreateRemovePeerOperator("remove-orphan-peer", c.cluster, 0, region, fit.OrphanPeers[0].StoreId)
 	}
+	checkerCounter.WithLabelValues("rule_checker", "remove-orphan-peer-hasUnhealthyFit").Inc()
 
 	// try to use orphan peers to replace unhealthy down peers.
 	for _, orphanPeer := range fit.OrphanPeers {
 		if pinDownPeer != nil {
 			if pinDownPeer.GetId() == orphanPeer.GetId() {
+				checkerCounter.WithLabelValues("rule_checker", "remove-orphan-peer1").Inc()
 				continue
 			}
 			// make sure the orphan peer is healthy.
 			if isUnhealthyPeer(orphanPeer.GetId()) || isDisconnectedPeer(orphanPeer) {
+				checkerCounter.WithLabelValues("rule_checker", "remove-orphan-peer2").Inc()
 				continue
 			}
 			// no consider witness in this path.
 			if pinDownPeer.GetIsWitness() || orphanPeer.GetIsWitness() {
+				checkerCounter.WithLabelValues("rule_checker", "remove-orphan-peer3").Inc()
 				continue
 			}
 			// pinDownPeer's store should be disconnected, because we use more strict judge before.
 			if !isDisconnectedPeer(pinDownPeer) {
+				checkerCounter.WithLabelValues("rule_checker", "remove-orphan-peer4").Inc()
 				continue
 			}
 			// check if down peer can replace with orphan peer.
@@ -490,6 +495,8 @@ func (c *RuleChecker) fixOrphanPeers(region *core.RegionInfo, fit *placement.Reg
 			} else {
 				checkerCounter.WithLabelValues("rule_checker", "replace-orphan-peer-no-fit").Inc()
 			}
+		} else {
+			checkerCounter.WithLabelValues("rule_checker", "remove-orphan-peer5").Inc()
 		}
 	}