-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 89
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PB-4578: Fix RT CR status with duplicate resources and RT controller with duplicate effort. #1529
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Codecov ReportAll modified lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1529 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 65.93% 65.99% +0.05%
==========================================
Files 43 43
Lines 5349 5349
==========================================
+ Hits 3527 3530 +3
+ Misses 1490 1488 -2
+ Partials 332 331 -1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
path.Operation == stork_api.ModifyResourcePathValue) { | ||
return fmt.Errorf("unsupported operation type for given path : %s", path.Operation) | ||
for _, object := range objects.Items { | ||
logrus.Debugf("Objects Item %v", object) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove this line.
dynamicClient := localInterface.Resource( | ||
object.GetObjectKind().GroupVersionKind().GroupVersion().WithResource(resource.Name)).Namespace(getTransformNamespace(transform.Namespace)) | ||
if err := resourcecollector.TransformResources(object, []stork_api.TransformResourceInfo{*resInfo}, metadata.GetName(), metadata.GetNamespace()); err != nil { | ||
log.TransformLog(transform).Errorf("Unable to transform resource: %s/%s having gvk:%v with error: %v", resInfo.Namespace, resInfo.Name, resInfo.GroupVersionKind, err) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
instead of gvk
say group version kind
.
Please add integration test to stork. |
As discussed with anjan currently we can rely on unit tests |
aa1056c
to
3dfa5b4
Compare
- Remove loop on the paths in the validateTransformResource as this is already been doing in the resourcecollector.TransformResources - Because of this redandent computation issue is solved and RT CR status will not be overloded with duplicate resource information. - Remove path.Operation validation in validateTransformResource as this is already completed with the RT CR is in Initial Stage using the ResourceTransformationController.validateSpecPath method.
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
To fix the performance while transforming resources in rt controller by removing the redundant computations which are even occupying the RT CR status
Does this PR change a user-facing CRD or CLI?:
no
Is a release note needed?:
no
Does this change need to be cherry-picked to a release branch?:
Yes because it is a bug in the latest release stork release.
JIRA BUG: https://portworx.atlassian.net/browse/PB-4578
Unit Test Result