Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Include invoice requests in async payment onions #3207
Include invoice requests in async payment onions #3207
Changes from all commits
cdc0c3b
3945bf8
88d689a
2ff6524
639446a
a80af56
9b3e307
6a42453
fead88f
520ae0b
925a0cb
d574de9
34e710e
240dd0a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will this type eventually be less than 2^16? If so, should we just pick something there and move this to
_encode_varint_length_prefixed_tlv
instead of usingcustom_tlvs
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My point of reference is mainly that eclair's approach has been to use experimental TLVs until the corresponding BOLT is close(r) to merge, e.g. for their experimental trampoline features. It does seem a little bit safer and might allow us to end up with a lower type since there wouldn't be risk of overlap with another feature?