[controller][server] Remove SIT ready-to-serve check for A/A and non-AGG store during L/F transition #3831
sixpluszeroVeniceCI-StaticAnalysisAndUnitTests.yml
on: pull_request
Matrix: Clients / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Controller / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Internal / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Router / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Server / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: StaticAnalysis
ValidateGradleWrapper
9s
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
0s
Annotations
22 errors and 18 warnings
|
StaticAnalysis (17)
Process completed with exit code 1.
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testResetPartition[1](AA_OFF):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
abstractStorageEngine.put(
1,
[(byte) 0x01, (byte) 0x4B, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x79, (byte) 0x46, (byte) 0x6F, (byte) 0x72, (byte) 0x50, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x72, (byte) 0x74, (byte) 0x69, (byte) 0x74, (byte) 0x69, (byte) 0x6F, (byte) 0x6E, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x5F, (byte) 0x62, (byte) 0x38, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x34, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x34, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x30, (byte) 0x38, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x5F, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x35, (byte) 0x63, (byte) 0x62, (byte) 0x39, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x34],
java.nio.HeapByteBuffer[pos=0 lim=17 cap=17]
);
Wanted 2 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.store.AbstractStorageEngine.put(AbstractStorageEngine.java:479)
But was 1 time:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.put(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:143)
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testResetPartition[1](AA_OFF):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
abstractStorageEngine.put(
1,
[(byte) 0x01, (byte) 0x4B, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x79, (byte) 0x46, (byte) 0x6F, (byte) 0x72, (byte) 0x50, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x72, (byte) 0x74, (byte) 0x69, (byte) 0x74, (byte) 0x69, (byte) 0x6F, (byte) 0x6E, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x5F, (byte) 0x62, (byte) 0x38, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x34, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x34, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x30, (byte) 0x38, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x5F, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x35, (byte) 0x63, (byte) 0x62, (byte) 0x39, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x34],
java.nio.HeapByteBuffer[pos=0 lim=17 cap=17]
);
Wanted 2 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.store.AbstractStorageEngine.put(AbstractStorageEngine.java:479)
But was 1 time:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.put(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:143)
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testResubscribeAfterRoleChange:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
activeActiveStoreIngestionTask.resubscribeForAllPartitions();
Wanted 4 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.resubscribeForAllPartitions(StoreIngestionTask.java:617)
But was 3 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1557)
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1557)
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1557)
|
|
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError(
<any string>,
1,
<Capturing argument>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4246)
However, there were exactly 29221 interactions with this mock:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_76bc60bef8_8b8e5ce9_v1-1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:884)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_76bc60bef8_8b8e5ce9_v1-1,
true
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:613)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:627)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:574)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4079)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:636)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run();
-> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:539)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1625)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4079)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1990451124
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1627)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1544)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1990451124
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1628)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_76bc60bef8_8b8e5ce9_v1-1, attempts=4, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1735858393478},
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1990451124
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1917)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_76bc60bef8_8b8e5ce9_v1-1, attempts=4, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1735858393478}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:569)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_76bc60bef8_8b8e5ce9_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2162)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_76bc60bef8_8b8e5ce9_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testOffsetSyncBeforeGracefulShutDown[0](AA_ON):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
java.lang.AssertionError: pcs.getLatestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset() for PARTITION_FOO is expected to be zero! expected [0] but found [2]
|
|
NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.testNativeMetadataRepositoryStats:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/repository/NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.java#L133
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [2000.0] but found [1000.0]
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testResubscribeAfterRoleChange:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
activeActiveStoreIngestionTask.resubscribeForAllPartitions();
Wanted 4 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.resubscribeForAllPartitions(StoreIngestionTask.java:617)
But was 3 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1557)
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1557)
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1557)
|
|
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError(
<any string>,
1,
<Capturing argument>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4246)
However, there were exactly 29221 interactions with this mock:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_76bc60bef8_8b8e5ce9_v1-1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:884)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_76bc60bef8_8b8e5ce9_v1-1,
true
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:613)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:627)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:574)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4079)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:636)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run();
-> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:539)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1625)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4079)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1990451124
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1627)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1544)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1990451124
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1628)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_76bc60bef8_8b8e5ce9_v1-1, attempts=4, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1735858393478},
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1990451124
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1917)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_76bc60bef8_8b8e5ce9_v1-1, attempts=4, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1735858393478}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:569)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_76bc60bef8_8b8e5ce9_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2162)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_76bc60bef8_8b8e5ce9_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testOffsetSyncBeforeGracefulShutDown[0](AA_ON):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
java.lang.AssertionError: pcs.getLatestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset() for PARTITION_FOO is expected to be zero! expected [0] but found [2]
|
|
NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.testNativeMetadataRepositoryStats:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/repository/NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.java#L133
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [2000.0] but found [1000.0]
|
|
KafkaConsumerServiceDelegatorTest.testKafkaConsumerServiceResubscriptionConcurrency:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/KafkaConsumerServiceDelegatorTest.java#L597
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [true] but found [false]
|
|
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testCorruptMessagesFailFast[15](AA_OFF):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
logNotifier.completed(
"TestTopic_8c55cbb5f0_760a1e0_v1",
1,
LongEqualOrGreaterThanMatcher(lowerBound=3),
"STANDBY"
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.notifier.LogNotifier.completed(LogNotifier.java:26)
Actually, there were zero interactions with this mock.
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testDataValidationCheckPointing[0](SORTED, AA_ON):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
logNotifier.completed(
"TestTopic_8de5cab437_8c529116_v1",
1,
LongEqualOrGreaterThanMatcher(lowerBound=1001),
"STANDBY"
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.notifier.LogNotifier.completed(LogNotifier.java:26)
However, there were exactly 729 interactions with this mock:
logNotifier.started(
"TestTopic_8de5cab437_8c529116_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportStarted$1(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:107)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_8de5cab437_8c529116_v1",
1,
2L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_8de5cab437_8c529116_v1",
1,
3L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_8de5cab437_8c529116_v1",
1,
4L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_8de5cab437_8c529116_v1",
1,
5L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_8de5cab437_8c529116_v1",
1,
6L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_8de5cab437_8c529116_v1",
1,
7L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_8de5cab437_8c529116_v1",
1,
8L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_8de5cab437_8c529116_v1",
1,
9L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_8de5cab437_8c529116_v1",
1,
10L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_8de5cab437_8c529116_v1",
1,
11L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_8de5cab437_8c529116_v1",
1,
12L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_8de5cab437_8c529116_v1",
1,
13L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_8de5cab437_8c529116_v1",
1,
14L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_8de5cab437_8c529116_v1",
1,
15L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_8de5cab437_8c529116_v1",
1,
16L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_8de5cab437_8c529116_v1",
1,
17L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_8
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testDataValidationCheckPointing[1](UNSORTED, AA_ON):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
logNotifier.completed(
"TestTopic_920a3c90f8_a538f3b1_v1",
1,
LongEqualOrGreaterThanMatcher(lowerBound=1001),
"STANDBY"
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.notifier.LogNotifier.completed(LogNotifier.java:26)
However, there were exactly 760 interactions with this mock:
logNotifier.started(
"TestTopic_920a3c90f8_a538f3b1_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportStarted$1(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:107)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_920a3c90f8_a538f3b1_v1",
1,
2L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_920a3c90f8_a538f3b1_v1",
1,
3L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_920a3c90f8_a538f3b1_v1",
1,
4L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_920a3c90f8_a538f3b1_v1",
1,
5L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_920a3c90f8_a538f3b1_v1",
1,
6L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_920a3c90f8_a538f3b1_v1",
1,
7L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_920a3c90f8_a538f3b1_v1",
1,
8L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_920a3c90f8_a538f3b1_v1",
1,
9L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_920a3c90f8_a538f3b1_v1",
1,
10L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_920a3c90f8_a538f3b1_v1",
1,
11L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_920a3c90f8_a538f3b1_v1",
1,
12L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_920a3c90f8_a538f3b1_v1",
1,
13L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_920a3c90f8_a538f3b1_v1",
1,
14L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_920a3c90f8_a538f3b1_v1",
1,
15L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_920a3c90f8_a538f3b1_v1",
1,
16L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_920a3c90f8_a538f3b1_v1",
1,
17L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testDataValidationCheckPointing[2](SORTED, AA_OFF):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
logNotifier.completed(
"TestTopic_9580e58c3e_45da79c3_v1",
1,
LongEqualOrGreaterThanMatcher(lowerBound=1001),
"STANDBY"
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.notifier.LogNotifier.completed(LogNotifier.java:26)
However, there were exactly 408 interactions with this mock:
logNotifier.started(
"TestTopic_9580e58c3e_45da79c3_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportStarted$1(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:107)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9580e58c3e_45da79c3_v1",
1,
2L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9580e58c3e_45da79c3_v1",
1,
3L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9580e58c3e_45da79c3_v1",
1,
4L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9580e58c3e_45da79c3_v1",
1,
5L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9580e58c3e_45da79c3_v1",
1,
6L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9580e58c3e_45da79c3_v1",
1,
7L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9580e58c3e_45da79c3_v1",
1,
8L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9580e58c3e_45da79c3_v1",
1,
9L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9580e58c3e_45da79c3_v1",
1,
10L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9580e58c3e_45da79c3_v1",
1,
11L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9580e58c3e_45da79c3_v1",
1,
12L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9580e58c3e_45da79c3_v1",
1,
13L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9580e58c3e_45da79c3_v1",
1,
14L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9580e58c3e_45da79c3_v1",
1,
15L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9580e58c3e_45da79c3_v1",
1,
16L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9580e58c3e_45da79c3_v1",
1,
17L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testDataValidationCheckPointing[3](UNSORTED, AA_OFF):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
logNotifier.completed(
"TestTopic_9903201af3_4783d764_v1",
1,
LongEqualOrGreaterThanMatcher(lowerBound=1001),
"STANDBY"
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.notifier.LogNotifier.completed(LogNotifier.java:26)
However, there were exactly 418 interactions with this mock:
logNotifier.started(
"TestTopic_9903201af3_4783d764_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportStarted$1(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:107)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9903201af3_4783d764_v1",
1,
2L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9903201af3_4783d764_v1",
1,
3L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9903201af3_4783d764_v1",
1,
4L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9903201af3_4783d764_v1",
1,
5L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9903201af3_4783d764_v1",
1,
6L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9903201af3_4783d764_v1",
1,
7L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9903201af3_4783d764_v1",
1,
8L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9903201af3_4783d764_v1",
1,
9L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9903201af3_4783d764_v1",
1,
10L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9903201af3_4783d764_v1",
1,
11L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9903201af3_4783d764_v1",
1,
12L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9903201af3_4783d764_v1",
1,
13L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9903201af3_4783d764_v1",
1,
14L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9903201af3_4783d764_v1",
1,
15L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9903201af3_4783d764_v1",
1,
16L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9903201af3_4783d764_v1",
1,
17L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_9
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testDelayedTransitionToOnlineInHybridMode[1](AA_OFF):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
logNotifier.completed(
<any string>,
<any integer>,
<any long>,
<any string>
);
Wanted *at least* 10 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.notifier.LogNotifier.completed(LogNotifier.java:26)
But was 9 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportCompleted$4(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:137)
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportCompleted$4(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:137)
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportCompleted$4(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:137)
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportCompleted$4(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:137)
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportCompleted$4(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:137)
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportCompleted$4(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:137)
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportCompleted$4(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:137)
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportCompleted$4(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:137)
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportCompleted$4(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:137)
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testGetAndUpdateLeaderCompletedState[3](BATCH_ONLY, FOLLOWER):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.methodCleanUp:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.misusing.UnfinishedStubbingException:
Unfinished stubbing detected here:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.getDefaultMockVeniceStoreVersionConfig(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:5315)
E.g. thenReturn() may be missing.
Examples of correct stubbing:
when(mock.isOk()).thenReturn(true);
when(mock.isOk()).thenThrow(exception);
doThrow(exception).when(mock).someVoidMethod();
Hints:
1. missing thenReturn()
2. you are trying to stub a final method, which is not supported
3. you are stubbing the behaviour of another mock inside before 'thenReturn' instruction is completed
|
|
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
Process completed with exit code 1.
|
|
ValidateGradleWrapper
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Router / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Router / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Router / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Controller / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Controller / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Controller / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
StaticAnalysis (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Internal / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Internal / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Internal / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Server / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Server / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Clients / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Clients / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Clients / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Server / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
Artifacts
Produced during runtime
| Name | Size | |
|---|---|---|
|
StaticAnalysis
Expired
|
631 KB |
|
|
clients-jdk11
Expired
|
2.9 MB |
|
|
clients-jdk17
Expired
|
2.93 MB |
|
|
clients-jdk8
Expired
|
2.85 MB |
|
|
controller-jdk11
Expired
|
1.34 MB |
|
|
controller-jdk17
Expired
|
1.33 MB |
|
|
controller-jdk8
Expired
|
1.33 MB |
|
|
internal-jdk11
Expired
|
3.04 MB |
|
|
internal-jdk17
Expired
|
3.05 MB |
|
|
internal-jdk8
Expired
|
3.03 MB |
|
|
router-jdk11
Expired
|
600 KB |
|
|
router-jdk17
Expired
|
604 KB |
|
|
router-jdk8
Expired
|
584 KB |
|
|
server-jdk11
Expired
|
9.26 MB |
|
|
server-jdk17
Expired
|
9.36 MB |
|
|
server-jdk8
Expired
|
17.4 MB |
|