[admin-tool][controller] Add new config into ZK and allow admin-tool to update the config #3846
minhmo1620VeniceCI-StaticAnalysisAndUnitTests.yml
on: pull_request
Matrix: Clients / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Controller / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Internal / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Router / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Server / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: StaticAnalysis
ValidateGradleWrapper
13s
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
0s
Annotations
22 errors and 18 warnings
|
Controller / UT & CodeCov (8)
Process completed with exit code 1.
|
|
Controller / UT & CodeCov (17)
Process completed with exit code 1.
|
|
Controller / UT & CodeCov (11)
Process completed with exit code 1.
|
|
NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.testNativeMetadataRepositoryStats:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/repository/NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.java#L133
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [2000.0] but found [1000.0]
|
|
NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.testNativeMetadataRepositoryStats:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/repository/NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.java#L133
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [2000.0] but found [1000.0]
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.methodSetUp:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.misusing.CannotStubVoidMethodWithReturnValue:
'recordTotalPollRequestLatency' is a *void method* and it *cannot* be stubbed with a *return value*!
Voids are usually stubbed with Throwables:
doThrow(exception).when(mock).someVoidMethod();
If you need to set the void method to do nothing you can use:
doNothing().when(mock).someVoidMethod();
For more information, check out the javadocs for Mockito.doNothing().
***
If you're unsure why you're getting above error read on.
Due to the nature of the syntax above problem might occur because:
1. The method you are trying to stub is *overloaded*. Make sure you are calling the right overloaded version.
2. Somewhere in your test you are stubbing *final methods*. Sorry, Mockito does not verify/stub final methods.
3. A spy is stubbed using when(spy.foo()).then() syntax. It is safer to stub spies -
- with doReturn|Throw() family of methods. More in javadocs for Mockito.spy() method.
4. Mocking methods declared on non-public parent classes is not supported.
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.methodCleanUp:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.misusing.CannotStubVoidMethodWithReturnValue:
'recordTotalAvgPartitionsPerConsumer' is a *void method* and it *cannot* be stubbed with a *return value*!
Voids are usually stubbed with Throwables:
doThrow(exception).when(mock).someVoidMethod();
If you need to set the void method to do nothing you can use:
doNothing().when(mock).someVoidMethod();
For more information, check out the javadocs for Mockito.doNothing().
***
If you're unsure why you're getting above error read on.
Due to the nature of the syntax above problem might occur because:
1. The method you are trying to stub is *overloaded*. Make sure you are calling the right overloaded version.
2. Somewhere in your test you are stubbing *final methods*. Sorry, Mockito does not verify/stub final methods.
3. A spy is stubbed using when(spy.foo()).then() syntax. It is safer to stub spies -
- with doReturn|Throw() family of methods. More in javadocs for Mockito.spy() method.
4. Mocking methods declared on non-public parent classes is not supported.
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError(
<any string>,
1,
<Capturing argument>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4246)
However, there were exactly 30889 interactions with this mock:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_89ab9f7c5f_92139382_v1-1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:884)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_89ab9f7c5f_92139382_v1-1,
true
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:613)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:627)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:574)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4079)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:636)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run();
-> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1625)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4079)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1240322221
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1627)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1544)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1240322221
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1628)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_89ab9f7c5f_92139382_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736156097534},
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1240322221
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1917)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_89ab9f7c5f_92139382_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736156097534}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:569)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_89ab9f7c5f_92139382_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2162)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_89ab9f7c5f_92139382_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.methodSetUp:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.misusing.CannotStubVoidMethodWithReturnValue:
'recordTotalPollRequestLatency' is a *void method* and it *cannot* be stubbed with a *return value*!
Voids are usually stubbed with Throwables:
doThrow(exception).when(mock).someVoidMethod();
If you need to set the void method to do nothing you can use:
doNothing().when(mock).someVoidMethod();
For more information, check out the javadocs for Mockito.doNothing().
***
If you're unsure why you're getting above error read on.
Due to the nature of the syntax above problem might occur because:
1. The method you are trying to stub is *overloaded*. Make sure you are calling the right overloaded version.
2. Somewhere in your test you are stubbing *final methods*. Sorry, Mockito does not verify/stub final methods.
3. A spy is stubbed using when(spy.foo()).then() syntax. It is safer to stub spies -
- with doReturn|Throw() family of methods. More in javadocs for Mockito.spy() method.
4. Mocking methods declared on non-public parent classes is not supported.
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.methodCleanUp:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.misusing.CannotStubVoidMethodWithReturnValue:
'recordTotalAvgPartitionsPerConsumer' is a *void method* and it *cannot* be stubbed with a *return value*!
Voids are usually stubbed with Throwables:
doThrow(exception).when(mock).someVoidMethod();
If you need to set the void method to do nothing you can use:
doNothing().when(mock).someVoidMethod();
For more information, check out the javadocs for Mockito.doNothing().
***
If you're unsure why you're getting above error read on.
Due to the nature of the syntax above problem might occur because:
1. The method you are trying to stub is *overloaded*. Make sure you are calling the right overloaded version.
2. Somewhere in your test you are stubbing *final methods*. Sorry, Mockito does not verify/stub final methods.
3. A spy is stubbed using when(spy.foo()).then() syntax. It is safer to stub spies -
- with doReturn|Throw() family of methods. More in javadocs for Mockito.spy() method.
4. Mocking methods declared on non-public parent classes is not supported.
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError(
<any string>,
1,
<Capturing argument>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4246)
However, there were exactly 30889 interactions with this mock:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_89ab9f7c5f_92139382_v1-1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:884)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_89ab9f7c5f_92139382_v1-1,
true
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:613)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:627)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:574)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4079)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:636)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run();
-> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1625)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4079)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1240322221
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1627)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1544)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1240322221
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1628)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_89ab9f7c5f_92139382_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736156097534},
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1240322221
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1917)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_89ab9f7c5f_92139382_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736156097534}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:569)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_89ab9f7c5f_92139382_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2162)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_89ab9f7c5f_92139382_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=
|
|
VeniceChangelogConsumerImplTest.testConsumeAfterImageWithCompaction:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/consumer/VeniceChangelogConsumerImplTest.java#L1
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded
|
|
KafkaConsumerServiceDelegatorTest.testKafkaConsumerServiceResubscriptionConcurrency:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/KafkaConsumerServiceDelegatorTest.java#L597
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [true] but found [false]
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testDataValidationCheckPointing[0](SORTED, AA_ON):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
logNotifier.completed(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
LongEqualOrGreaterThanMatcher(lowerBound=1001),
"STANDBY"
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.notifier.LogNotifier.completed(LogNotifier.java:26)
However, there were exactly 932 interactions with this mock:
logNotifier.started(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportStarted$1(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:107)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
2L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
3L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
4L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
5L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
6L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
7L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
8L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
9L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
10L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
11L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
12L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
13L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
14L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
15L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
16L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
17L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testResubscribeAfterRoleChange:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
abstractStorageEngine.putWithReplicationMetadata(
1,
<any>,
<any>,
<any>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.store.AbstractStorageEngine.putWithReplicationMetadata(AbstractStorageEngine.java:487)
However, there were exactly 210 interactions with this mock:
abstractStorageEngine.getStoreVersionName();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.<init>(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:35)
abstractStorageEngine.createStoragePartition(
Replica: null-1000000000, deferred-write: false, read-only: false, write-only: true, read-write leader for default CF: false, read-write leader for RMD CF: false
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.createStoragePartition(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:53)
abstractStorageEngine.beginBatchWrite(
Replica: TestTopic_deebcc35c5_853ceb91_v1-1, deferred-write: false, read-only: false, write-only: true, read-write leader for default CF: false, read-write leader for RMD CF: false,
{},
Optional.empty
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.beginBatchWrite(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:108)
abstractStorageEngine.beginBatchWrite(
Replica: TestTopic_deebcc35c5_853ceb91_v1-2, deferred-write: false, read-only: false, write-only: true, read-write leader for default CF: false, read-write leader for RMD CF: false,
{},
Optional.empty
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.beginBatchWrite(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:108)
abstractStorageEngine.sync(1);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.sync(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:178)
abstractStorageEngine.sync(2);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.sync(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:178)
abstractStorageEngine.put(
2,
[(byte) 0x02, (byte) 0x4B, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x79, (byte) 0x46, (byte) 0x6F, (byte) 0x72, (byte) 0x50, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x72, (byte) 0x74, (byte) 0x69, (byte) 0x74, (byte) 0x69, (byte) 0x6F, (byte) 0x6E, (byte) 0x32, (byte) 0x5F, (byte) 0x37, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x32, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x38, (byte) 0x39, (byte) 0x63, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x62, (byte) 0x5F, (byte) 0x36, (byte) 0x34, (byte) 0x63, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x62, (byte) 0x37, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00],
java.nio.HeapByteBuffer[pos=0 lim=21 cap=21]
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.put(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:143)
abstractStorageEngine.sync(2);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.sync(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:178)
abstractStorageEngine.put(
2,
[(byte) 0x02, (byte) 0x4B, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x79, (byte) 0x46, (byte) 0x6F, (byte) 0x72, (byte) 0x50, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x72, (byte) 0x74, (byte) 0x69, (byte) 0x74, (byte) 0x69, (byte) 0x6F, (byte) 0x6E, (byte) 0x32, (byte) 0x5F, (byte) 0x37, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x32, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x38, (byte) 0x39, (byte) 0x63, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x62, (byte) 0x5F, (byte) 0x36, (byte) 0x34, (byte) 0x63, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x62, (byte) 0x37, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x01],
java.nio.HeapByteBuffer[pos=0 lim=21 cap=21]
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.put(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:143)
abstractStorageEngine.sync(2);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.sync(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:178)
abstractStorageEngine.put(
2,
[(byte) 0x02, (byte) 0x4B, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x79, (byte) 0x46, (byte) 0x6F, (byte) 0x72, (byte) 0x50, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x72, (byte) 0x74, (byte) 0x69, (byte) 0x74, (byte) 0x69, (byte) 0x6F, (byte) 0x6E, (byte) 0x32, (byte) 0x5F, (byte) 0x37, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x32, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x38, (byte) 0x39, (byte) 0x63, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x62, (byte) 0x5F, (byte) 0x36, (byte) 0x34, (byte) 0x63, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x62, (byte) 0x37, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x02],
java.nio.HeapByteBuffer[p
|
|
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testOffsetSyncBeforeGracefulShutDown[0](AA_ON):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
java.lang.AssertionError: pcs.getLatestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset() for PARTITION_FOO is expected to be zero! expected [0] but found [2]
|
|
VeniceChangelogConsumerImplTest.testConsumeAfterImageWithCompaction:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/consumer/VeniceChangelogConsumerImplTest.java#L1
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded
|
|
KafkaConsumerServiceDelegatorTest.testKafkaConsumerServiceResubscriptionConcurrency:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/KafkaConsumerServiceDelegatorTest.java#L597
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [true] but found [false]
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testDataValidationCheckPointing[0](SORTED, AA_ON):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
logNotifier.completed(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
LongEqualOrGreaterThanMatcher(lowerBound=1001),
"STANDBY"
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.notifier.LogNotifier.completed(LogNotifier.java:26)
However, there were exactly 932 interactions with this mock:
logNotifier.started(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportStarted$1(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:107)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
2L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
3L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
4L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
5L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
6L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
7L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
8L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
9L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
10L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
11L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
12L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
13L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
14L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
15L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
16L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b22064e8db_e9057202_v1",
1,
17L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:205)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_b
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testResubscribeAfterRoleChange:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
abstractStorageEngine.putWithReplicationMetadata(
1,
<any>,
<any>,
<any>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.store.AbstractStorageEngine.putWithReplicationMetadata(AbstractStorageEngine.java:487)
However, there were exactly 210 interactions with this mock:
abstractStorageEngine.getStoreVersionName();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.<init>(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:35)
abstractStorageEngine.createStoragePartition(
Replica: null-1000000000, deferred-write: false, read-only: false, write-only: true, read-write leader for default CF: false, read-write leader for RMD CF: false
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.createStoragePartition(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:53)
abstractStorageEngine.beginBatchWrite(
Replica: TestTopic_deebcc35c5_853ceb91_v1-1, deferred-write: false, read-only: false, write-only: true, read-write leader for default CF: false, read-write leader for RMD CF: false,
{},
Optional.empty
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.beginBatchWrite(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:108)
abstractStorageEngine.beginBatchWrite(
Replica: TestTopic_deebcc35c5_853ceb91_v1-2, deferred-write: false, read-only: false, write-only: true, read-write leader for default CF: false, read-write leader for RMD CF: false,
{},
Optional.empty
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.beginBatchWrite(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:108)
abstractStorageEngine.sync(1);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.sync(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:178)
abstractStorageEngine.sync(2);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.sync(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:178)
abstractStorageEngine.put(
2,
[(byte) 0x02, (byte) 0x4B, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x79, (byte) 0x46, (byte) 0x6F, (byte) 0x72, (byte) 0x50, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x72, (byte) 0x74, (byte) 0x69, (byte) 0x74, (byte) 0x69, (byte) 0x6F, (byte) 0x6E, (byte) 0x32, (byte) 0x5F, (byte) 0x37, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x32, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x38, (byte) 0x39, (byte) 0x63, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x62, (byte) 0x5F, (byte) 0x36, (byte) 0x34, (byte) 0x63, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x62, (byte) 0x37, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00],
java.nio.HeapByteBuffer[pos=0 lim=21 cap=21]
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.put(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:143)
abstractStorageEngine.sync(2);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.sync(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:178)
abstractStorageEngine.put(
2,
[(byte) 0x02, (byte) 0x4B, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x79, (byte) 0x46, (byte) 0x6F, (byte) 0x72, (byte) 0x50, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x72, (byte) 0x74, (byte) 0x69, (byte) 0x74, (byte) 0x69, (byte) 0x6F, (byte) 0x6E, (byte) 0x32, (byte) 0x5F, (byte) 0x37, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x32, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x38, (byte) 0x39, (byte) 0x63, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x62, (byte) 0x5F, (byte) 0x36, (byte) 0x34, (byte) 0x63, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x62, (byte) 0x37, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x01],
java.nio.HeapByteBuffer[pos=0 lim=21 cap=21]
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.put(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:143)
abstractStorageEngine.sync(2);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.sync(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:178)
abstractStorageEngine.put(
2,
[(byte) 0x02, (byte) 0x4B, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x79, (byte) 0x46, (byte) 0x6F, (byte) 0x72, (byte) 0x50, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x72, (byte) 0x74, (byte) 0x69, (byte) 0x74, (byte) 0x69, (byte) 0x6F, (byte) 0x6E, (byte) 0x32, (byte) 0x5F, (byte) 0x37, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x32, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x38, (byte) 0x39, (byte) 0x63, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x62, (byte) 0x5F, (byte) 0x36, (byte) 0x34, (byte) 0x63, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x62, (byte) 0x37, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x02],
java.nio.HeapByteBuffer[p
|
|
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testOffsetSyncBeforeGracefulShutDown[0](AA_ON):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
java.lang.AssertionError: pcs.getLatestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset() for PARTITION_FOO is expected to be zero! expected [0] but found [2]
|
|
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
Process completed with exit code 1.
|
|
ValidateGradleWrapper
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Router / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Router / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Router / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
StaticAnalysis (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Controller / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Controller / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Controller / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Internal / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Internal / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Internal / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Server / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Server / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Clients / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Clients / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Clients / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Server / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
Artifacts
Produced during runtime
| Name | Size | |
|---|---|---|
|
StaticAnalysis
Expired
|
630 KB |
|
|
clients-jdk11
Expired
|
2.91 MB |
|
|
clients-jdk17
Expired
|
2.93 MB |
|
|
clients-jdk8
Expired
|
2.85 MB |
|
|
controller-jdk11
Expired
|
1.37 MB |
|
|
controller-jdk17
Expired
|
1.37 MB |
|
|
controller-jdk8
Expired
|
1.35 MB |
|
|
internal-jdk11
Expired
|
3.05 MB |
|
|
internal-jdk17
Expired
|
3.06 MB |
|
|
internal-jdk8
Expired
|
3.04 MB |
|
|
router-jdk11
Expired
|
599 KB |
|
|
router-jdk17
Expired
|
605 KB |
|
|
router-jdk8
Expired
|
592 KB |
|
|
server-jdk11
Expired
|
9.98 MB |
|
|
server-jdk17
Expired
|
8.79 MB |
|
|
server-jdk8
Expired
|
18.1 MB |
|