-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.5k
[CVP] Use at-use info in processBinOp
#88523
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms Author: Yingwei Zheng (dtcxzyw) ChangesThis patch uses Compile-time impact: http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=a5ed14bc8e122fa5ac0aa81f8d8390931bd6b4e4&to=a83d3402b663439b91cb37a046fb7ac0220ba5c7&stat=instructions%3Au Related issue: #87854 Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88523.diff 3 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/CorrelatedValuePropagation.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/CorrelatedValuePropagation.cpp
index fb334e8292eb18..715cdaff972796 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/CorrelatedValuePropagation.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/CorrelatedValuePropagation.cpp
@@ -1105,13 +1105,10 @@ static bool processBinOp(BinaryOperator *BinOp, LazyValueInfo *LVI) {
return false;
Instruction::BinaryOps Opcode = BinOp->getOpcode();
- Value *LHS = BinOp->getOperand(0);
- Value *RHS = BinOp->getOperand(1);
-
- ConstantRange LRange =
- LVI->getConstantRange(LHS, BinOp, /*UndefAllowed*/ false);
- ConstantRange RRange =
- LVI->getConstantRange(RHS, BinOp, /*UndefAllowed*/ false);
+ ConstantRange LRange = LVI->getConstantRangeAtUse(BinOp->getOperandUse(0),
+ /*UndefAllowed=*/false);
+ ConstantRange RRange = LVI->getConstantRangeAtUse(BinOp->getOperandUse(1),
+ /*UndefAllowed=*/false);
bool Changed = false;
bool NewNUW = false, NewNSW = false;
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/CorrelatedValuePropagation/cond-at-use.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/CorrelatedValuePropagation/cond-at-use.ll
index 0b95139f3dcbaa..3af4c70a5621c8 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/CorrelatedValuePropagation/cond-at-use.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/CorrelatedValuePropagation/cond-at-use.ll
@@ -596,3 +596,37 @@ define i16 @and_elide_poison_flags_missing_noundef(i16 %a) {
%sel = select i1 %cmp, i16 %and, i16 24
ret i16 %sel
}
+
+define i32 @pr87854(i32 noundef %x.1, i32 noundef %i) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @pr87854(
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[COND:%.*]] = icmp sgt i32 [[X_1:%.*]], -1
+; CHECK-NEXT: tail call void @llvm.assume(i1 [[COND]])
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[INBOUNDS:%.*]] = icmp ult i32 [[I:%.*]], [[X_1]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[NEXT:%.*]] = add nuw i32 [[I]], 1
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[SPEC_SELECT:%.*]] = select i1 [[INBOUNDS]], i32 [[NEXT]], i32 -1
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[SPEC_SELECT]]
+;
+ %cond = icmp sgt i32 %x.1, -1
+ tail call void @llvm.assume(i1 %cond)
+ %inbounds = icmp ult i32 %i, %x.1
+ %next = add i32 %i, 1
+ %spec.select = select i1 %inbounds, i32 %next, i32 -1
+ ret i32 %spec.select
+}
+
+define i64 @test_shl_nsw_at_use(i64 noundef %x) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test_shl_nsw_at_use(
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[ADD:%.*]] = add i64 [[X:%.*]], 2147483648
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP:%.*]] = icmp ult i64 [[ADD]], 4294967296
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[SHL:%.*]] = shl nsw i64 [[X]], 32
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[SHR:%.*]] = ashr exact i64 [[SHL]], 32
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[RES:%.*]] = select i1 [[CMP]], i64 [[SHR]], i64 0
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret i64 [[RES]]
+;
+ %add = add i64 %x, 2147483648
+ %cmp = icmp ult i64 %add, 4294967296
+ %shl = shl i64 %x, 32
+ %shr = ashr exact i64 %shl, 32
+ %res = select i1 %cmp, i64 %shr, i64 0
+ ret i64 %res
+}
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/CorrelatedValuePropagation/phi-common-val.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/CorrelatedValuePropagation/phi-common-val.ll
index 7f102bc1e4fe2e..7e712947e37ad9 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/CorrelatedValuePropagation/phi-common-val.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/CorrelatedValuePropagation/phi-common-val.ll
@@ -156,12 +156,13 @@ bb3:
define i32 @PR43802_without_nowrap(i32 %arg) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @PR43802_without_nowrap(
; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUB:%.*]] = sub i32 0, [[ARG:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUB1:%.*]] = sub nsw i32 0, [[ARG:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP:%.*]] = icmp eq i32 [[ARG]], -2147483648
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[CMP]], label [[BB2:%.*]], label [[BB3:%.*]]
; CHECK: bb2:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[BB3]]
; CHECK: bb3:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUB:%.*]] = phi i32 [ -2147483648, [[BB2]] ], [ [[SUB1]], [[ENTRY:%.*]] ]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[SUB]]
;
entry:
|
; CHECK-NEXT: [[COND:%.*]] = icmp sgt i32 [[X_1:%.*]], -1 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: tail call void @llvm.assume(i1 [[COND]]) | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[INBOUNDS:%.*]] = icmp ult i32 [[I:%.*]], [[X_1]] | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[NEXT:%.*]] = add nuw i32 [[I]], 1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know why the nsw flag cannot be inferred from the assumption. intersectAssumeOrGuardBlockValueConstantRange
should handle this case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think intersectAssumeOrGuardBlockValueConstantRange
should be the one getting the nsw
, its the select that enables it.
but either way, I think the issue is that UseBlockValue
is false so we don't actually compute the %x.1
CR when evaluating the inbounds
cmp.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As an aside, we may want to test increasing const unsigned MaxUsesToInspect = 3;
. Seems startlingly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the issue is that UseBlockValue is false so we don't actually compute the %x.1 CR when evaluating the inbounds cmp.
Yes, we don't use block values when deriving information from select conditions right now. I'm not sure doing this is viable, especially in the at-use logic.
ret i32 %spec.select | ||
} | ||
|
||
define i64 @test_shl_nsw_at_use(i64 noundef %x) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It will be folded by instcombine later: https://godbolt.org/z/4MGsvnsnT
LGTM. Wait on another. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Thanks. Looks like we have replaced all |
This patch uses `getConstantRangeAtUse` to infer nsw/nuw flags with at-use info. It will enables more optimizations in InstCombine. Compile-time impact: http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=a5ed14bc8e122fa5ac0aa81f8d8390931bd6b4e4&to=a83d3402b663439b91cb37a046fb7ac0220ba5c7&stat=instructions%3Au Related issue: llvm#87854
This patch uses
getConstantRangeAtUse
to infer nsw/nuw flags with at-use info. It will enables more optimizations in InstCombine.Compile-time impact: http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=a5ed14bc8e122fa5ac0aa81f8d8390931bd6b4e4&to=a83d3402b663439b91cb37a046fb7ac0220ba5c7&stat=instructions%3Au
Related issue: #87854