Use explicit package list and ensure it is tested in CI

[wshanks]

• In pyproject.toml, use an explicit package list instead of using the find directive.

• In GitHub Actions workflow, do not use an editable install since that implicitly includes all modules below uncertainties/ and we want to make sure we test the package in its installed form.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 48.29%. Comparing base (3c3853d) to head (d0c0ee9).

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #232       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   95.74%   48.29%   -47.46%     
===========================================
  Files          12       12               
  Lines        1903     1903               
===========================================
- Hits         1822      919      -903     
- Misses         81      984      +903     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[wshanks]

I tested this in my fork and it failed with the old way that tool.setuptools.packages.find was formatted. I thought I would need to set PYTHONSAFEPATH or use pytest's import-mode to make sure that the uncertainties in the working directory was not still used instead of the installed one, but I saw the unumpy import error without those settings, so I did not include them here.

[newville]

Thanks!

[wshanks]

Hmm, it looks like this caused the way we have coverage set up not to count the coverage of the main package's code. I will look into getting that counted while still testing the installed package. Anyone else is welcome to look into it as well.