Allow generic named types to be directly used as a provider #22
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Using a generic function as a provider cased issued when the func had named types like so:
When generating the weld code, it would fail since it tried to generate the function signature like this:
The type arguments were not included in the template "package replacement" code. It would only go over the
exchange_ops.TestFunc
, but not it's arguments.Adding the type arguments to the
Named
type clause seems to solve this issue and it not correctly replaces theexample/
directory from the package name.